An External Independent Validation of APACHE IV in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit

INTRODUCTION: Intensive care unit (ICU) prognostic models are predominantly used in more developed nations such as the United States, Europe and Australia. These are not that popular in Southeast Asian countries due to costs and technology considerations. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wong, R.S., Ismail, N.A., Tan, C.C.
Format: Article
Published: Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/19447/
http://www.annals.edu.sg/pdf/44VolNo4Apr2015/V44N4p127.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.19447
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.194472018-09-28T02:58:02Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/19447/ An External Independent Validation of APACHE IV in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit Wong, R.S. Ismail, N.A. Tan, C.C. HB Economic Theory R Medicine INTRODUCTION: Intensive care unit (ICU) prognostic models are predominantly used in more developed nations such as the United States, Europe and Australia. These are not that popular in Southeast Asian countries due to costs and technology considerations. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the suitability of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) IV model in a single centre Malaysian ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at the single centre ICU in Hospital Sultanah Aminah (HSA) Malaysia. External validation of APACHE IV involved a cohort of 916 patients who were admitted in 2009. Model performance was assessed through its calibration and discrimination abilities. A first-level customisation using logistic regression approach was also applied to improve model calibration. RESULTS: APACHE IV exhibited good discrimination, with an area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.78. However, the model's overall fit was observed to be poor, as indicated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (Ĉ = 113, P <0.001). Predicted in-ICU mortality rate (28.1%) was significantly higher than the actual in-ICU mortality rate (18.8%). Model calibration was improved after applying first-level customisation (Ĉ = 6.39, P = 0.78) although discrimination was not affected. CONCLUSION: APACHE IV is not suitable for application in HSA ICU, without further customisation. The model's lack of fit in the Malaysian study is attributed to differences in the baseline characteristics between HSA ICU and APACHE IV datasets. Other possible factors could be due to differences in clinical practice, quality and services of health care systems between Malaysia and the United States. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2015 Article PeerReviewed Wong, R.S. and Ismail, N.A. and Tan, C.C. (2015) An External Independent Validation of APACHE IV in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 44 (4). pp. 127-132. ISSN 0304-4602 http://www.annals.edu.sg/pdf/44VolNo4Apr2015/V44N4p127.pdf
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic HB Economic Theory
R Medicine
spellingShingle HB Economic Theory
R Medicine
Wong, R.S.
Ismail, N.A.
Tan, C.C.
An External Independent Validation of APACHE IV in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit
description INTRODUCTION: Intensive care unit (ICU) prognostic models are predominantly used in more developed nations such as the United States, Europe and Australia. These are not that popular in Southeast Asian countries due to costs and technology considerations. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the suitability of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) IV model in a single centre Malaysian ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at the single centre ICU in Hospital Sultanah Aminah (HSA) Malaysia. External validation of APACHE IV involved a cohort of 916 patients who were admitted in 2009. Model performance was assessed through its calibration and discrimination abilities. A first-level customisation using logistic regression approach was also applied to improve model calibration. RESULTS: APACHE IV exhibited good discrimination, with an area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.78. However, the model's overall fit was observed to be poor, as indicated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (Ĉ = 113, P <0.001). Predicted in-ICU mortality rate (28.1%) was significantly higher than the actual in-ICU mortality rate (18.8%). Model calibration was improved after applying first-level customisation (Ĉ = 6.39, P = 0.78) although discrimination was not affected. CONCLUSION: APACHE IV is not suitable for application in HSA ICU, without further customisation. The model's lack of fit in the Malaysian study is attributed to differences in the baseline characteristics between HSA ICU and APACHE IV datasets. Other possible factors could be due to differences in clinical practice, quality and services of health care systems between Malaysia and the United States.
format Article
author Wong, R.S.
Ismail, N.A.
Tan, C.C.
author_facet Wong, R.S.
Ismail, N.A.
Tan, C.C.
author_sort Wong, R.S.
title An External Independent Validation of APACHE IV in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit
title_short An External Independent Validation of APACHE IV in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit
title_full An External Independent Validation of APACHE IV in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr An External Independent Validation of APACHE IV in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed An External Independent Validation of APACHE IV in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit
title_sort external independent validation of apache iv in a malaysian intensive care unit
publisher Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/19447/
http://www.annals.edu.sg/pdf/44VolNo4Apr2015/V44N4p127.pdf
_version_ 1643690991201288192
score 13.18916