Daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in Malaysia

Lighting energy savings, as well as visual and non-visual user benefits have been widely attributed to daylighting. This paper explores daylight design strategy, visual appraisal, Daylight Factor (DF), lighting energy usage and discomfort glare using two green building offices in Malaysia, which hav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lim, G.H., Hirning, M.B., Keumala, N., Ghafar, N.A.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/19119/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.028
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.19119
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.191192018-09-05T07:16:48Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/19119/ Daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in Malaysia Lim, G.H. Hirning, M.B. Keumala, N. Ghafar, N.A. TH Building construction Lighting energy savings, as well as visual and non-visual user benefits have been widely attributed to daylighting. This paper explores daylight design strategy, visual appraisal, Daylight Factor (DF), lighting energy usage and discomfort glare using two green building offices in Malaysia, which have incorporated daylighting into both façade and interior design. Visual appraisal surveys were collected from 39 and 145 subjects in the open plan working space of the Energy Commission Building (ECB) and Public Works Department Block G (PWD), respectively. The survey focused on task brightness, colour appearance, uniformity and lighting preference. Discomfort glare assessed via occupant point-of-view luminance maps was juxtaposed here from a glare study involving the same buildings. Illuminance loggers were used to monitor artificial lighting usage as well as the DF on a selected floor of each building. There were no significant differences in occupant responses to the visual appraisal survey for both office spaces. Using MS1525:2014 and Green Building Index (GBI NRNC) tool as baselines, the DF performance of both offices differs significantly: PWD had a 45.5% daylit area, with ECB a 14.8% daylit area for DF >1%. However, lighting energy usage results show substantial savings of 53% and 41% occurred from daylighting. These findings of visual appraisal, DF, lighting energy savings and discomfort glare show a discrepancy in using only the DF to justify the daylight performance of an office space in a tropical climate such as Malaysia. The findings suggest that equivalent consideration should be given to interior design to facilitate daylighting, which is often beyond the control of designer, but in the hands of office end users. Elsevier 2017 Article PeerReviewed Lim, G.H. and Hirning, M.B. and Keumala, N. and Ghafar, N.A. (2017) Daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in Malaysia. Energy and Buildings, 141. pp. 175-185. ISSN 0378-7788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.028 doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.028
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic TH Building construction
spellingShingle TH Building construction
Lim, G.H.
Hirning, M.B.
Keumala, N.
Ghafar, N.A.
Daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in Malaysia
description Lighting energy savings, as well as visual and non-visual user benefits have been widely attributed to daylighting. This paper explores daylight design strategy, visual appraisal, Daylight Factor (DF), lighting energy usage and discomfort glare using two green building offices in Malaysia, which have incorporated daylighting into both façade and interior design. Visual appraisal surveys were collected from 39 and 145 subjects in the open plan working space of the Energy Commission Building (ECB) and Public Works Department Block G (PWD), respectively. The survey focused on task brightness, colour appearance, uniformity and lighting preference. Discomfort glare assessed via occupant point-of-view luminance maps was juxtaposed here from a glare study involving the same buildings. Illuminance loggers were used to monitor artificial lighting usage as well as the DF on a selected floor of each building. There were no significant differences in occupant responses to the visual appraisal survey for both office spaces. Using MS1525:2014 and Green Building Index (GBI NRNC) tool as baselines, the DF performance of both offices differs significantly: PWD had a 45.5% daylit area, with ECB a 14.8% daylit area for DF >1%. However, lighting energy usage results show substantial savings of 53% and 41% occurred from daylighting. These findings of visual appraisal, DF, lighting energy savings and discomfort glare show a discrepancy in using only the DF to justify the daylight performance of an office space in a tropical climate such as Malaysia. The findings suggest that equivalent consideration should be given to interior design to facilitate daylighting, which is often beyond the control of designer, but in the hands of office end users.
format Article
author Lim, G.H.
Hirning, M.B.
Keumala, N.
Ghafar, N.A.
author_facet Lim, G.H.
Hirning, M.B.
Keumala, N.
Ghafar, N.A.
author_sort Lim, G.H.
title Daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in Malaysia
title_short Daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in Malaysia
title_full Daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in Malaysia
title_fullStr Daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in Malaysia
title_sort daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in malaysia
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2017
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/19119/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.028
_version_ 1643690893102809088
score 13.188404