Multi-objective selection and structural optimization of the gantry in a gantry machine tool for improving static, dynamic, and weight and cost performance

In this investigation, the multi-objective selection and optimization of a gantry machine tool is achieved by analytic hierarchy process, multi-objective genetic algorithm, and Pareto-Edgeworth-Grierson-multi-criteria decision-making method. The objectives include maximum static deformation, the fir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Besharati, S.R., Dabbagh, V., Amini, H., Sarhan, Ahmed Aly Diaa Mohammed, Akbari, J., Abd Shukor, Mohd Hamdi, Ong, Zhi Chao
Format: Article
Published: SAGE Publications (UK and US) 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/18581/
https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X15597047
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.18581
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.185812021-10-01T03:43:11Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/18581/ Multi-objective selection and structural optimization of the gantry in a gantry machine tool for improving static, dynamic, and weight and cost performance Besharati, S.R. Dabbagh, V. Amini, H. Sarhan, Ahmed Aly Diaa Mohammed Akbari, J. Abd Shukor, Mohd Hamdi Ong, Zhi Chao TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery In this investigation, the multi-objective selection and optimization of a gantry machine tool is achieved by analytic hierarchy process, multi-objective genetic algorithm, and Pareto-Edgeworth-Grierson-multi-criteria decision-making method. The objectives include maximum static deformation, the first four natural frequencies, mass, and fabrication cost of the gantry. Further structural optimization of the best configuration was accomplished using multi-objective genetic algorithm to improve all objectives except cost. The result of sensitivity analysis reveals the major contribution of columns of gantry with respect to the crossbeam's contribution. After determining the most effective geometrical parameters using sensitivity analysis, multi-objective genetic algorithm was performed to obtain the Pareto-optimal solutions. In order to choose the final configuration, Pareto-Edgeworth-Grierson-multi-criteria decision-making was applied. The procedure outlined in this article could be used for selection and optimization of gantry as quantitative method as opposed to traditional qualitative method exploited in industrial application for design of gantry. SAGE Publications (UK and US) 2016 Article PeerReviewed Besharati, S.R. and Dabbagh, V. and Amini, H. and Sarhan, Ahmed Aly Diaa Mohammed and Akbari, J. and Abd Shukor, Mohd Hamdi and Ong, Zhi Chao (2016) Multi-objective selection and structural optimization of the gantry in a gantry machine tool for improving static, dynamic, and weight and cost performance. Concurrent Engineering, 24 (1). pp. 83-93. ISSN 1063-293X https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X15597047 doi:10.1177/1063293X15597047
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Besharati, S.R.
Dabbagh, V.
Amini, H.
Sarhan, Ahmed Aly Diaa Mohammed
Akbari, J.
Abd Shukor, Mohd Hamdi
Ong, Zhi Chao
Multi-objective selection and structural optimization of the gantry in a gantry machine tool for improving static, dynamic, and weight and cost performance
description In this investigation, the multi-objective selection and optimization of a gantry machine tool is achieved by analytic hierarchy process, multi-objective genetic algorithm, and Pareto-Edgeworth-Grierson-multi-criteria decision-making method. The objectives include maximum static deformation, the first four natural frequencies, mass, and fabrication cost of the gantry. Further structural optimization of the best configuration was accomplished using multi-objective genetic algorithm to improve all objectives except cost. The result of sensitivity analysis reveals the major contribution of columns of gantry with respect to the crossbeam's contribution. After determining the most effective geometrical parameters using sensitivity analysis, multi-objective genetic algorithm was performed to obtain the Pareto-optimal solutions. In order to choose the final configuration, Pareto-Edgeworth-Grierson-multi-criteria decision-making was applied. The procedure outlined in this article could be used for selection and optimization of gantry as quantitative method as opposed to traditional qualitative method exploited in industrial application for design of gantry.
format Article
author Besharati, S.R.
Dabbagh, V.
Amini, H.
Sarhan, Ahmed Aly Diaa Mohammed
Akbari, J.
Abd Shukor, Mohd Hamdi
Ong, Zhi Chao
author_facet Besharati, S.R.
Dabbagh, V.
Amini, H.
Sarhan, Ahmed Aly Diaa Mohammed
Akbari, J.
Abd Shukor, Mohd Hamdi
Ong, Zhi Chao
author_sort Besharati, S.R.
title Multi-objective selection and structural optimization of the gantry in a gantry machine tool for improving static, dynamic, and weight and cost performance
title_short Multi-objective selection and structural optimization of the gantry in a gantry machine tool for improving static, dynamic, and weight and cost performance
title_full Multi-objective selection and structural optimization of the gantry in a gantry machine tool for improving static, dynamic, and weight and cost performance
title_fullStr Multi-objective selection and structural optimization of the gantry in a gantry machine tool for improving static, dynamic, and weight and cost performance
title_full_unstemmed Multi-objective selection and structural optimization of the gantry in a gantry machine tool for improving static, dynamic, and weight and cost performance
title_sort multi-objective selection and structural optimization of the gantry in a gantry machine tool for improving static, dynamic, and weight and cost performance
publisher SAGE Publications (UK and US)
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/18581/
https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X15597047
_version_ 1713200124453191680
score 13.187175