Patient involvement in decision-making: A cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic

Objective: Shared decision-making has been advocated as a useful model for patient management. In developing Asian countries such as Malaysia, there is a common belief that patients prefer a passive role in clinical consultation. As such, the objective of this study was to determine Malaysian patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ambigapathy, R., Chia, Y.C., Ng, C.J.
Format: Article
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/18272/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010063
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.18272
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.182722017-11-14T09:07:25Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/18272/ Patient involvement in decision-making: A cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic Ambigapathy, R. Chia, Y.C. Ng, C.J. R Medicine Objective: Shared decision-making has been advocated as a useful model for patient management. In developing Asian countries such as Malaysia, there is a common belief that patients prefer a passive role in clinical consultation. As such, the objective of this study was to determine Malaysian patients' role preference in decision-making and the associated factors. Design: A cross-sectional study. Setting: Study was conducted at an urban primary care clinic in Malaysia in 2012. Participants: Patients aged 21 years were chosen using systematic random sampling. Methods: Consenting patients answered a self-administered questionnaire, which included demographic data and their preferred and actual role before and after consultation. Doctors were asked to determine patients' role preference. The Control Preference Scale was used to assess patients' role preference. Primary outcome: Prevalence of patients' preferred role in decision-making. Secondary outcomes: (1) Actual role played by the patient in decision-making. (2) Sociodemographic factors associated with patients' preferred role in decision-making. (3) Doctors' perception of patients' involvement in decision-making. Results: The response rate was 95.1% (470/494). Shared decision-making was preferred by 51.9% of patients, followed by passive (26.3%) and active (21.8%) roles in decision-making. Higher household income was significantly associated with autonomous role preference (p=0.018). Doctors' perception did not concur with patients' preferred role. Among patients whom doctors perceived to prefer a passive role, 73.5% preferred an autonomous role (p=0.900, κ=0.006). Conclusions: The majority of patients attending the primary care clinic preferred and played an autonomous role in decision-making. Doctors underestimated patients' preference to play an autonomous role. BMJ Publishing Group 2016 Article PeerReviewed Ambigapathy, R. and Chia, Y.C. and Ng, C.J. (2016) Patient involvement in decision-making: A cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic. BMJ Open, 6 (1). e010063. ISSN 2044-6055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010063 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010063
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine
spellingShingle R Medicine
Ambigapathy, R.
Chia, Y.C.
Ng, C.J.
Patient involvement in decision-making: A cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic
description Objective: Shared decision-making has been advocated as a useful model for patient management. In developing Asian countries such as Malaysia, there is a common belief that patients prefer a passive role in clinical consultation. As such, the objective of this study was to determine Malaysian patients' role preference in decision-making and the associated factors. Design: A cross-sectional study. Setting: Study was conducted at an urban primary care clinic in Malaysia in 2012. Participants: Patients aged 21 years were chosen using systematic random sampling. Methods: Consenting patients answered a self-administered questionnaire, which included demographic data and their preferred and actual role before and after consultation. Doctors were asked to determine patients' role preference. The Control Preference Scale was used to assess patients' role preference. Primary outcome: Prevalence of patients' preferred role in decision-making. Secondary outcomes: (1) Actual role played by the patient in decision-making. (2) Sociodemographic factors associated with patients' preferred role in decision-making. (3) Doctors' perception of patients' involvement in decision-making. Results: The response rate was 95.1% (470/494). Shared decision-making was preferred by 51.9% of patients, followed by passive (26.3%) and active (21.8%) roles in decision-making. Higher household income was significantly associated with autonomous role preference (p=0.018). Doctors' perception did not concur with patients' preferred role. Among patients whom doctors perceived to prefer a passive role, 73.5% preferred an autonomous role (p=0.900, κ=0.006). Conclusions: The majority of patients attending the primary care clinic preferred and played an autonomous role in decision-making. Doctors underestimated patients' preference to play an autonomous role.
format Article
author Ambigapathy, R.
Chia, Y.C.
Ng, C.J.
author_facet Ambigapathy, R.
Chia, Y.C.
Ng, C.J.
author_sort Ambigapathy, R.
title Patient involvement in decision-making: A cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic
title_short Patient involvement in decision-making: A cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic
title_full Patient involvement in decision-making: A cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic
title_fullStr Patient involvement in decision-making: A cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic
title_full_unstemmed Patient involvement in decision-making: A cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic
title_sort patient involvement in decision-making: a cross-sectional study in a malaysian primary care clinic
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/18272/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010063
_version_ 1643690659245195264
score 13.160551