Evaluation of different peak models of eye blink EEG for signal peak detection using artificial neural network

There is a growing interest of research being conducted on detecting eye blink to assist physically impaired people for verbal communication and controlling devices using electroencephalogram (EEG) signal. One particular eye blink can be determined from use of peak points. Therefore, the purpose of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam, A., Ibrahim, Z., Mokhtar, N., Shapiai, M.I., Mubin, M.
Format: Article
Published: Institute of Computer Science 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/18056/
http://dx.doi.org/10.14311/NNW.2016.26.004
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.18056
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.180562017-10-23T04:33:31Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/18056/ Evaluation of different peak models of eye blink EEG for signal peak detection using artificial neural network Adam, A. Ibrahim, Z. Mokhtar, N. Shapiai, M.I. Mubin, M. TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering There is a growing interest of research being conducted on detecting eye blink to assist physically impaired people for verbal communication and controlling devices using electroencephalogram (EEG) signal. One particular eye blink can be determined from use of peak points. Therefore, the purpose of peak detection algorithm is to distinguish an actual peak location from a list of peak candidates. The need of a good peak model is important in ensuring a satisfy classification performance. In general, there are various peak models available in literature, which have been tested in several peak detection algorithms. In this study, performance evaluation of the existing peak models is conducted based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with particle swarm optimization (PSO) as learning algorithm. This study evaluates the performance of eye blink EEG signal peak detection algorithm for four different peak models which are Dumpala's, Acir's, Liu's, and Dingle's peak models. To generalize the performance evaluation, two case studies of eye blink EEG signal are considered, which are single and double eye blink signals. It has been observed that the best test performance, in average, is 91.94% and 87.47% for single and double eye blink signals, respectively. These results indicate that the Acir's peak model offers high accuracy of peak detection for the two eye blink EEG signals as compared to other peak models. The result of statistical analysis also indicates that the Acir's peak model is better than Dingle's and Dumpala's peak models. Institute of Computer Science 2016 Article PeerReviewed Adam, A. and Ibrahim, Z. and Mokhtar, N. and Shapiai, M.I. and Mubin, M. (2016) Evaluation of different peak models of eye blink EEG for signal peak detection using artificial neural network. Neural Network World, 26 (1). pp. 67-89. ISSN 1210-0552 http://dx.doi.org/10.14311/NNW.2016.26.004 doi:10.14311/NNW.2016.26.004
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Adam, A.
Ibrahim, Z.
Mokhtar, N.
Shapiai, M.I.
Mubin, M.
Evaluation of different peak models of eye blink EEG for signal peak detection using artificial neural network
description There is a growing interest of research being conducted on detecting eye blink to assist physically impaired people for verbal communication and controlling devices using electroencephalogram (EEG) signal. One particular eye blink can be determined from use of peak points. Therefore, the purpose of peak detection algorithm is to distinguish an actual peak location from a list of peak candidates. The need of a good peak model is important in ensuring a satisfy classification performance. In general, there are various peak models available in literature, which have been tested in several peak detection algorithms. In this study, performance evaluation of the existing peak models is conducted based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with particle swarm optimization (PSO) as learning algorithm. This study evaluates the performance of eye blink EEG signal peak detection algorithm for four different peak models which are Dumpala's, Acir's, Liu's, and Dingle's peak models. To generalize the performance evaluation, two case studies of eye blink EEG signal are considered, which are single and double eye blink signals. It has been observed that the best test performance, in average, is 91.94% and 87.47% for single and double eye blink signals, respectively. These results indicate that the Acir's peak model offers high accuracy of peak detection for the two eye blink EEG signals as compared to other peak models. The result of statistical analysis also indicates that the Acir's peak model is better than Dingle's and Dumpala's peak models.
format Article
author Adam, A.
Ibrahim, Z.
Mokhtar, N.
Shapiai, M.I.
Mubin, M.
author_facet Adam, A.
Ibrahim, Z.
Mokhtar, N.
Shapiai, M.I.
Mubin, M.
author_sort Adam, A.
title Evaluation of different peak models of eye blink EEG for signal peak detection using artificial neural network
title_short Evaluation of different peak models of eye blink EEG for signal peak detection using artificial neural network
title_full Evaluation of different peak models of eye blink EEG for signal peak detection using artificial neural network
title_fullStr Evaluation of different peak models of eye blink EEG for signal peak detection using artificial neural network
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different peak models of eye blink EEG for signal peak detection using artificial neural network
title_sort evaluation of different peak models of eye blink eeg for signal peak detection using artificial neural network
publisher Institute of Computer Science
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/18056/
http://dx.doi.org/10.14311/NNW.2016.26.004
_version_ 1643690597385502720
score 13.18916