Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal

Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam, A., Ibrahim, Z., Mokhtar, N., Shapiai, M.I., Cumming, P., Mubin, M.
Format: Article
Published: SpringerOpen 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/18054/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.18054
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.180542017-10-23T04:20:48Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/18054/ Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal Adam, A. Ibrahim, Z. Mokhtar, N. Shapiai, M.I. Cumming, P. Mubin, M. TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by Dumpala, Acir, Liu, and Dingle are routinely used to detect peaks in EEG signals acquired in clinical studies of epilepsy or eye blink. The optimal peak model is the most reliable peak detection performance in a particular application. A fair measure of performance of different models requires a common and unbiased platform. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the four different peak models using the extreme learning machine (ELM)-based peak detection algorithm. We found that the Dingle model gave the best performance, with 72 % accuracy in the analysis of real EEG data. Statistical analysis conferred that the Dingle model afforded significantly better mean testing accuracy than did the Acir and Liu models, which were in the range 37–52 %. Meanwhile, the Dingle model has no significant difference compared to Dumpala model. SpringerOpen 2016 Article PeerReviewed Adam, A. and Ibrahim, Z. and Mokhtar, N. and Shapiai, M.I. and Cumming, P. and Mubin, M. (2016) Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal. SpringerPlus, 5 (1). p. 1036. ISSN 2193-1801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0 doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Adam, A.
Ibrahim, Z.
Mokhtar, N.
Shapiai, M.I.
Cumming, P.
Mubin, M.
Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
description Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by Dumpala, Acir, Liu, and Dingle are routinely used to detect peaks in EEG signals acquired in clinical studies of epilepsy or eye blink. The optimal peak model is the most reliable peak detection performance in a particular application. A fair measure of performance of different models requires a common and unbiased platform. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the four different peak models using the extreme learning machine (ELM)-based peak detection algorithm. We found that the Dingle model gave the best performance, with 72 % accuracy in the analysis of real EEG data. Statistical analysis conferred that the Dingle model afforded significantly better mean testing accuracy than did the Acir and Liu models, which were in the range 37–52 %. Meanwhile, the Dingle model has no significant difference compared to Dumpala model.
format Article
author Adam, A.
Ibrahim, Z.
Mokhtar, N.
Shapiai, M.I.
Cumming, P.
Mubin, M.
author_facet Adam, A.
Ibrahim, Z.
Mokhtar, N.
Shapiai, M.I.
Cumming, P.
Mubin, M.
author_sort Adam, A.
title Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
title_short Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
title_full Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
title_fullStr Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
title_sort evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for eeg signal
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/18054/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0
_version_ 1643690596807737344
score 13.160551