Risperidone and Olanzapne in-patient Utilization in the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur

The objective of this study was to compare in-patient drug use patterns, costs, and outcomes associated with risperidone or olanzapine in a naturalistic clinical setting. Retrospective chart reviews of 92 patients with psychotic disorders were conducted at the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UM...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sulaiman, Ahmad Hatim, Yen, T.H.
Format: Article
Published: Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/1805/
https://jummec.um.edu.my/article/view/4537
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.1805
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.18052020-07-20T04:52:21Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/1805/ Risperidone and Olanzapne in-patient Utilization in the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur Sulaiman, Ahmad Hatim Yen, T.H. R Medicine The objective of this study was to compare in-patient drug use patterns, costs, and outcomes associated with risperidone or olanzapine in a naturalistic clinical setting. Retrospective chart reviews of 92 patients with psychotic disorders were conducted at the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC). Data was collected from patients who were hospitalized and for whom risperidone or olanzapine was the drug of first choice for long-term pharmacologic treatment. Proportion of patients for whom efficacy of the studied treatment could be established (as rated by the treating physician) was higher, but not significantly, with risperidone compared to olanzapine (p = 0.46). The average dose of the studied medication was 2.9 ± 1.0 mg/day for risperidone and 9.7 ± 2.4 mg/day for olanzapine. The total cost was significantly higher (p <0.0001) for olanzapine (RM140.40; 95% CI: 108.4–181.9)compared to risperidone (RM50.80, 95% CI: 39.5–65.3). The daily cost was also significantly higher for olanzapine (RM19.16; 95% CI: 17.72–20.72) compared to risperidone RM4.95; 95% CI: 4.46–5.51, p < 0.0001). Analysis of responders showed significantly higher daily and total costs of treatment with olanzapine compared to risperidone. These preliminary data suggest that treatment with risperidone may be more costeffective than treatment with olanzapine. However, a longer duration of study and more data is needed before a proper conclusion on cost-effectiveness is made. Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya 2006 Article PeerReviewed Sulaiman, Ahmad Hatim and Yen, T.H. (2006) Risperidone and Olanzapne in-patient Utilization in the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur. Journal of the University of Malaya Medical Centre (JUMMEC), 9 (1). pp. 23-29. ISSN 1823-7339 https://jummec.um.edu.my/article/view/4537
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine
spellingShingle R Medicine
Sulaiman, Ahmad Hatim
Yen, T.H.
Risperidone and Olanzapne in-patient Utilization in the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur
description The objective of this study was to compare in-patient drug use patterns, costs, and outcomes associated with risperidone or olanzapine in a naturalistic clinical setting. Retrospective chart reviews of 92 patients with psychotic disorders were conducted at the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC). Data was collected from patients who were hospitalized and for whom risperidone or olanzapine was the drug of first choice for long-term pharmacologic treatment. Proportion of patients for whom efficacy of the studied treatment could be established (as rated by the treating physician) was higher, but not significantly, with risperidone compared to olanzapine (p = 0.46). The average dose of the studied medication was 2.9 ± 1.0 mg/day for risperidone and 9.7 ± 2.4 mg/day for olanzapine. The total cost was significantly higher (p <0.0001) for olanzapine (RM140.40; 95% CI: 108.4–181.9)compared to risperidone (RM50.80, 95% CI: 39.5–65.3). The daily cost was also significantly higher for olanzapine (RM19.16; 95% CI: 17.72–20.72) compared to risperidone RM4.95; 95% CI: 4.46–5.51, p < 0.0001). Analysis of responders showed significantly higher daily and total costs of treatment with olanzapine compared to risperidone. These preliminary data suggest that treatment with risperidone may be more costeffective than treatment with olanzapine. However, a longer duration of study and more data is needed before a proper conclusion on cost-effectiveness is made.
format Article
author Sulaiman, Ahmad Hatim
Yen, T.H.
author_facet Sulaiman, Ahmad Hatim
Yen, T.H.
author_sort Sulaiman, Ahmad Hatim
title Risperidone and Olanzapne in-patient Utilization in the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur
title_short Risperidone and Olanzapne in-patient Utilization in the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur
title_full Risperidone and Olanzapne in-patient Utilization in the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur
title_fullStr Risperidone and Olanzapne in-patient Utilization in the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur
title_full_unstemmed Risperidone and Olanzapne in-patient Utilization in the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur
title_sort risperidone and olanzapne in-patient utilization in the university of malaya medical centre, kuala lumpur
publisher Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya
publishDate 2006
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/1805/
https://jummec.um.edu.my/article/view/4537
_version_ 1674066711661248512
score 13.160551