Fatimids, crusaders and the fall of Islamic Jerusalem: Foes or allies?

The fall of Islamic Jerusalem to the crusaders during the first Crusade created a sense of agitation and anger amongst Muslims as Islamic Jerusalem had been under their rule for centuries before. A considerable number of scholars have pointed at the Fatimids as the main cause of the fall of Islamic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abu-Munshar, M.Y.
Format: Article
Published: Taylor & Francis 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/15316/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.15316
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.153162015-12-28T02:01:45Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/15316/ Fatimids, crusaders and the fall of Islamic Jerusalem: Foes or allies? Abu-Munshar, M.Y. G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation H Social Sciences (General) The fall of Islamic Jerusalem to the crusaders during the first Crusade created a sense of agitation and anger amongst Muslims as Islamic Jerusalem had been under their rule for centuries before. A considerable number of scholars have pointed at the Fatimids as the main cause of the fall of Islamic Jerusalem, claiming that the region would not have fallen had it not been for the alliance and collaboration between the Fatimids and the crusaders. This article is an attempt to present a critical analysis of the historical narratives of Muslim and non-Muslim historians who have continued to accuse the Fatimids of collaborating with the crusaders and depict them as the main cause of the fall of Islamic Jerusalem during the first Crusade. It also tries to answer the following two questions. Did the Fatimids really invite the crusaders to invade al-Sham? And is it true that the Fatimids misunderstood the crusaders' aims and targets? Taylor & Francis 2010 Article PeerReviewed Abu-Munshar, M.Y. (2010) Fatimids, crusaders and the fall of Islamic Jerusalem: Foes or allies? Al-Masāq: Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean, 22 (1). pp. 45-56.
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
H Social Sciences (General)
spellingShingle G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
H Social Sciences (General)
Abu-Munshar, M.Y.
Fatimids, crusaders and the fall of Islamic Jerusalem: Foes or allies?
description The fall of Islamic Jerusalem to the crusaders during the first Crusade created a sense of agitation and anger amongst Muslims as Islamic Jerusalem had been under their rule for centuries before. A considerable number of scholars have pointed at the Fatimids as the main cause of the fall of Islamic Jerusalem, claiming that the region would not have fallen had it not been for the alliance and collaboration between the Fatimids and the crusaders. This article is an attempt to present a critical analysis of the historical narratives of Muslim and non-Muslim historians who have continued to accuse the Fatimids of collaborating with the crusaders and depict them as the main cause of the fall of Islamic Jerusalem during the first Crusade. It also tries to answer the following two questions. Did the Fatimids really invite the crusaders to invade al-Sham? And is it true that the Fatimids misunderstood the crusaders' aims and targets?
format Article
author Abu-Munshar, M.Y.
author_facet Abu-Munshar, M.Y.
author_sort Abu-Munshar, M.Y.
title Fatimids, crusaders and the fall of Islamic Jerusalem: Foes or allies?
title_short Fatimids, crusaders and the fall of Islamic Jerusalem: Foes or allies?
title_full Fatimids, crusaders and the fall of Islamic Jerusalem: Foes or allies?
title_fullStr Fatimids, crusaders and the fall of Islamic Jerusalem: Foes or allies?
title_full_unstemmed Fatimids, crusaders and the fall of Islamic Jerusalem: Foes or allies?
title_sort fatimids, crusaders and the fall of islamic jerusalem: foes or allies?
publisher Taylor & Francis
publishDate 2010
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/15316/
_version_ 1643690028216352768
score 13.160551