Writing an invited review
An invited review provides a detailed and comprehensive narrative analysis of recent developments in a specific topic, and highlights important points that have been previously published. It usually consists of a short unstructured abstract, introduction, subheadings to organise the topic, and a sum...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.um.edu.my/14966/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.um.eprints.14966 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.um.eprints.149662015-12-01T01:19:36Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/14966/ Writing an invited review Peh, W.C.G. Ng, K.H. R Medicine An invited review provides a detailed and comprehensive narrative analysis of recent developments in a specific topic, and highlights important points that have been previously published. It usually consists of a short unstructured abstract, introduction, subheadings to organise the topic, and a summary. The text is usually relatively long compared to other paper categories, typically up to 15 manuscript pages or 4,000 words. The reference list is expected to comprehensively cover all the major published work, with up to 50-75 references being typical. The ideal invited review should be topical, current, balanced, accurate, quotable and easily understood, with clear take-home messages. 2010 Article PeerReviewed Peh, W.C.G. and Ng, K.H. (2010) Writing an invited review. Singapore Medical Journal, 51 (4). pp. 271-274. |
institution |
Universiti Malaya |
building |
UM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaya |
content_source |
UM Research Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/ |
topic |
R Medicine |
spellingShingle |
R Medicine Peh, W.C.G. Ng, K.H. Writing an invited review |
description |
An invited review provides a detailed and comprehensive narrative analysis of recent developments in a specific topic, and highlights important points that have been previously published. It usually consists of a short unstructured abstract, introduction, subheadings to organise the topic, and a summary. The text is usually relatively long compared to other paper categories, typically up to 15 manuscript pages or 4,000 words. The reference list is expected to comprehensively cover all the major published work, with up to 50-75 references being typical. The ideal invited review should be topical, current, balanced, accurate, quotable and easily understood, with clear take-home messages. |
format |
Article |
author |
Peh, W.C.G. Ng, K.H. |
author_facet |
Peh, W.C.G. Ng, K.H. |
author_sort |
Peh, W.C.G. |
title |
Writing an invited review |
title_short |
Writing an invited review |
title_full |
Writing an invited review |
title_fullStr |
Writing an invited review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Writing an invited review |
title_sort |
writing an invited review |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/14966/ |
_version_ |
1643689943269113856 |
score |
13.160551 |