Effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of Asian outpatients with schizophrenia

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia among Asian patients in an outpatient setting. Methods: This was an open-label, prospective, observational study involving 339 patients from Indonesia, Pakistan, Malaysia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Habil, H., Gondoyoewono, H., Chaudhry, H.R., Samanwongthai, U., Hamid, A.R.A., Hashmi, I.T., Budiman, R., Knowles, A.G., Buenaventura, R.
Format: Article
Published: 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/11047/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18184531
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.11047
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.110472014-12-17T02:52:38Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/11047/ Effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of Asian outpatients with schizophrenia Habil, H. Gondoyoewono, H. Chaudhry, H.R. Samanwongthai, U. Hamid, A.R.A. Hashmi, I.T. Budiman, R. Knowles, A.G. Buenaventura, R. R Medicine Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia among Asian patients in an outpatient setting. Methods: This was an open-label, prospective, observational study involving 339 patients from Indonesia, Pakistan, Malaysia, Thailand, and Singapore. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression Severity scale (CGI-S), and safety parameters were assessed. Results: 62 of patients responded to olanzapine treatment, defined a priori as a reduction in BPRS of > 40 from baseline. Following the 8-week treatment period, the BPRS total, BPRS positive, BPRS negative, and CGI-S scores decreased by 18.7 (95 CT: 17.4 20.2), 6.1 (5.6, 6.6), 2.9 (2.6, 3.2), and 1.5 points (median 1.0), respectively (p < 0,0001). In total, 31 of the 339 patients (9.1) failed to complete the study according to the study description. Loss to follow-up and personal conflict were the most common reasons for discontinuation. There were 30 treatment-emergent adverse events with six serious cases, assessed as unrelated to study drug, reported. Conclusion: This study further demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in actual clinical practice settings, in reducing the severity of psychopathological symptoms in Asian patients with schizophrenia. 2007 Article PeerReviewed Habil, H. and Gondoyoewono, H. and Chaudhry, H.R. and Samanwongthai, U. and Hamid, A.R.A. and Hashmi, I.T. and Budiman, R. and Knowles, A.G. and Buenaventura, R. (2007) Effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of Asian outpatients with schizophrenia. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 45 (12). pp. 631-642. ISSN 0946-1965 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18184531
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine
spellingShingle R Medicine
Habil, H.
Gondoyoewono, H.
Chaudhry, H.R.
Samanwongthai, U.
Hamid, A.R.A.
Hashmi, I.T.
Budiman, R.
Knowles, A.G.
Buenaventura, R.
Effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of Asian outpatients with schizophrenia
description Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia among Asian patients in an outpatient setting. Methods: This was an open-label, prospective, observational study involving 339 patients from Indonesia, Pakistan, Malaysia, Thailand, and Singapore. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression Severity scale (CGI-S), and safety parameters were assessed. Results: 62 of patients responded to olanzapine treatment, defined a priori as a reduction in BPRS of > 40 from baseline. Following the 8-week treatment period, the BPRS total, BPRS positive, BPRS negative, and CGI-S scores decreased by 18.7 (95 CT: 17.4 20.2), 6.1 (5.6, 6.6), 2.9 (2.6, 3.2), and 1.5 points (median 1.0), respectively (p < 0,0001). In total, 31 of the 339 patients (9.1) failed to complete the study according to the study description. Loss to follow-up and personal conflict were the most common reasons for discontinuation. There were 30 treatment-emergent adverse events with six serious cases, assessed as unrelated to study drug, reported. Conclusion: This study further demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in actual clinical practice settings, in reducing the severity of psychopathological symptoms in Asian patients with schizophrenia.
format Article
author Habil, H.
Gondoyoewono, H.
Chaudhry, H.R.
Samanwongthai, U.
Hamid, A.R.A.
Hashmi, I.T.
Budiman, R.
Knowles, A.G.
Buenaventura, R.
author_facet Habil, H.
Gondoyoewono, H.
Chaudhry, H.R.
Samanwongthai, U.
Hamid, A.R.A.
Hashmi, I.T.
Budiman, R.
Knowles, A.G.
Buenaventura, R.
author_sort Habil, H.
title Effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of Asian outpatients with schizophrenia
title_short Effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of Asian outpatients with schizophrenia
title_full Effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of Asian outpatients with schizophrenia
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of Asian outpatients with schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of Asian outpatients with schizophrenia
title_sort effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of asian outpatients with schizophrenia
publishDate 2007
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/11047/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18184531
_version_ 1643688950171172864
score 13.159267