Screening for urinary tract infection in women with hyperemesis gravidarum

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate urine microscopy, dipstick analysis and urinary symptoms in screening for urinary tract infection (UTI) in hyperemesis gravidarum (HG). Materials and Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed on women at first hospitalization for HG. A clea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tan, P.C., King, A.S.J., Omar, S.Z.
Format: Article
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/10840/
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01652.x/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.10840
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.108402014-07-16T00:09:42Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/10840/ Screening for urinary tract infection in women with hyperemesis gravidarum Tan, P.C. King, A.S.J. Omar, S.Z. R Medicine RG Gynecology and obstetrics Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate urine microscopy, dipstick analysis and urinary symptoms in screening for urinary tract infection (UTI) in hyperemesis gravidarum (HG). Materials and Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed on women at first hospitalization for HG. A clean-catch mid-stream urine sample from each recruit was sent for microscopy (for bacteria, leucocytes and erythrocytes), dipstick analysis (for leukocyte esterase, nitrites, protein and hemoglobin) and microbiological culture. The presence of current urinary symptoms was elicited by questionnaire. UTI is defined as at least 105 colony-forming units/mL of a single uropathogen on culture. Screening test parameters were analyzed against UTI. Results: UTI was diagnosed in 15/292 subjects (5.1). Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis of microscopic urine leucocytes revealed area under the curve = 0.64, 95 confidence interval (CI) 0.5-0.79, P = 0.063 and erythrocytes area under the curve = 0.53, 95 CI 0.39-0.67, P = 0.67 for UTI indicating the limited screening utility of these parameters. Microscopic bacteriuria (likelihood ratio LR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7-1.5) and urine dipstick leukocyte esterase (LR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8), nitrites (LR 2.3, 95% CI 0.3-17.2), protein (LR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.6) and hemoglobin (LR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.5) were not useful screening tests for UTI in HG. Elicited symptoms were also not predictive of UTI. Conclusion: Urine microscopy, dipstick analysis and urinary symptoms were not useful in screening for UTI in HG. UTI should be established by urine culture in HG before starting antibiotic treatment. 2012 Article PeerReviewed Tan, P.C. and King, A.S.J. and Omar, S.Z. (2012) Screening for urinary tract infection in women with hyperemesis gravidarum. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 38 (1). pp. 145-153. ISSN 1341-8076 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01652.x/full 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01652.x
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine
RG Gynecology and obstetrics
spellingShingle R Medicine
RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Tan, P.C.
King, A.S.J.
Omar, S.Z.
Screening for urinary tract infection in women with hyperemesis gravidarum
description Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate urine microscopy, dipstick analysis and urinary symptoms in screening for urinary tract infection (UTI) in hyperemesis gravidarum (HG). Materials and Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed on women at first hospitalization for HG. A clean-catch mid-stream urine sample from each recruit was sent for microscopy (for bacteria, leucocytes and erythrocytes), dipstick analysis (for leukocyte esterase, nitrites, protein and hemoglobin) and microbiological culture. The presence of current urinary symptoms was elicited by questionnaire. UTI is defined as at least 105 colony-forming units/mL of a single uropathogen on culture. Screening test parameters were analyzed against UTI. Results: UTI was diagnosed in 15/292 subjects (5.1). Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis of microscopic urine leucocytes revealed area under the curve = 0.64, 95 confidence interval (CI) 0.5-0.79, P = 0.063 and erythrocytes area under the curve = 0.53, 95 CI 0.39-0.67, P = 0.67 for UTI indicating the limited screening utility of these parameters. Microscopic bacteriuria (likelihood ratio LR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7-1.5) and urine dipstick leukocyte esterase (LR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8), nitrites (LR 2.3, 95% CI 0.3-17.2), protein (LR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.6) and hemoglobin (LR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.5) were not useful screening tests for UTI in HG. Elicited symptoms were also not predictive of UTI. Conclusion: Urine microscopy, dipstick analysis and urinary symptoms were not useful in screening for UTI in HG. UTI should be established by urine culture in HG before starting antibiotic treatment.
format Article
author Tan, P.C.
King, A.S.J.
Omar, S.Z.
author_facet Tan, P.C.
King, A.S.J.
Omar, S.Z.
author_sort Tan, P.C.
title Screening for urinary tract infection in women with hyperemesis gravidarum
title_short Screening for urinary tract infection in women with hyperemesis gravidarum
title_full Screening for urinary tract infection in women with hyperemesis gravidarum
title_fullStr Screening for urinary tract infection in women with hyperemesis gravidarum
title_full_unstemmed Screening for urinary tract infection in women with hyperemesis gravidarum
title_sort screening for urinary tract infection in women with hyperemesis gravidarum
publishDate 2012
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/10840/
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01652.x/full
_version_ 1643688900641685504
score 13.214267