Dextrose saline compared with normal saline rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare 5 dextrose-0.9 saline against 0.9 saline solution in the intravenous rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum. METHODS: Women at their first hospitalization for hyperemesis gravidarum were enrolled on admission to the ward and randomly assigned to receive either 5 dextrose-0.9 sal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tan, P.C., Norazilah, M.J., Omar, S.Z.
Format: Article
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/10827/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.10827
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.108272014-07-18T00:31:50Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/10827/ Dextrose saline compared with normal saline rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum a randomized controlled trial Tan, P.C. Norazilah, M.J. Omar, S.Z. R Medicine RG Gynecology and obstetrics OBJECTIVE: To compare 5 dextrose-0.9 saline against 0.9 saline solution in the intravenous rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum. METHODS: Women at their first hospitalization for hyperemesis gravidarum were enrolled on admission to the ward and randomly assigned to receive either 5 dextrose-0.9 saline or 0.9 saline by intravenous infusion at a rate 125 mL/h over 24 hours in a double-blind trial. All participants also received thiamine and an antiemetic intravenously. Oral intake was allowed as tolerated. Primary outcomes were resolution of ketonuria and well-being (by 10-point visual numerical rating scale) at 24 hours. Nausea visual numerical rating scale scores were obtained every 8 hours for 24 hours. RESULTS: Persistent ketonuria rates after the 24-hour study period were 10 of 101 (9.9) compared with 11 of 101 (10.9) (P>.99; relative risk 0.9, 95 confidence interval 0.4-2.2) and median (interquartile range) wellbeing scores at 24 hours were 9 (8-10) compared with 9 (8-9.5) (P=.73) in the 5 dextrose-0.9 saline and 0.9 saline arms, respectively. Repeated measures analysis of variance of the nausea visual numerical rating scale score as assessed every 8 hours during the 24-hour study period showed a significant difference in favor of the 5 dextrose-0.9 saline arm (P=.046) with the superiority apparent at 8 and 16 hours, but the advantage had dissipated by 24 hours. Secondary outcomes of vomiting, resolution of hyponatremia, hypochloremia and hypokalemia, length of hospitalization, duration of intravenous antiemetic, and rehydration were not different. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous rehydration with 5 dextrose-0.9 saline or 0.9 saline solution in women hospitalized for hyperemesis gravidarum produced similar outcomes. 2013 Article PeerReviewed Tan, P.C. and Norazilah, M.J. and Omar, S.Z. (2013) Dextrose saline compared with normal saline rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 121 (2). pp. 291-298. ISSN 0029-7844 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827c5e99
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine
RG Gynecology and obstetrics
spellingShingle R Medicine
RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Tan, P.C.
Norazilah, M.J.
Omar, S.Z.
Dextrose saline compared with normal saline rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum a randomized controlled trial
description OBJECTIVE: To compare 5 dextrose-0.9 saline against 0.9 saline solution in the intravenous rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum. METHODS: Women at their first hospitalization for hyperemesis gravidarum were enrolled on admission to the ward and randomly assigned to receive either 5 dextrose-0.9 saline or 0.9 saline by intravenous infusion at a rate 125 mL/h over 24 hours in a double-blind trial. All participants also received thiamine and an antiemetic intravenously. Oral intake was allowed as tolerated. Primary outcomes were resolution of ketonuria and well-being (by 10-point visual numerical rating scale) at 24 hours. Nausea visual numerical rating scale scores were obtained every 8 hours for 24 hours. RESULTS: Persistent ketonuria rates after the 24-hour study period were 10 of 101 (9.9) compared with 11 of 101 (10.9) (P>.99; relative risk 0.9, 95 confidence interval 0.4-2.2) and median (interquartile range) wellbeing scores at 24 hours were 9 (8-10) compared with 9 (8-9.5) (P=.73) in the 5 dextrose-0.9 saline and 0.9 saline arms, respectively. Repeated measures analysis of variance of the nausea visual numerical rating scale score as assessed every 8 hours during the 24-hour study period showed a significant difference in favor of the 5 dextrose-0.9 saline arm (P=.046) with the superiority apparent at 8 and 16 hours, but the advantage had dissipated by 24 hours. Secondary outcomes of vomiting, resolution of hyponatremia, hypochloremia and hypokalemia, length of hospitalization, duration of intravenous antiemetic, and rehydration were not different. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous rehydration with 5 dextrose-0.9 saline or 0.9 saline solution in women hospitalized for hyperemesis gravidarum produced similar outcomes.
format Article
author Tan, P.C.
Norazilah, M.J.
Omar, S.Z.
author_facet Tan, P.C.
Norazilah, M.J.
Omar, S.Z.
author_sort Tan, P.C.
title Dextrose saline compared with normal saline rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum a randomized controlled trial
title_short Dextrose saline compared with normal saline rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum a randomized controlled trial
title_full Dextrose saline compared with normal saline rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Dextrose saline compared with normal saline rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Dextrose saline compared with normal saline rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum a randomized controlled trial
title_sort dextrose saline compared with normal saline rehydration of hyperemesis gravidarum a randomized controlled trial
publishDate 2013
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/10827/
_version_ 1643688898002419712
score 13.18916