Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman

This paper presents the performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code. To calculate the bit error rate, different types of error correcting code were used through an Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel. Three error controls types; Bose- Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH), Cycli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Othman, Mohd Hayyul Dltizam
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/67695/1/67695.PDF
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/67695/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.67695
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.676952024-11-05T05:35:22Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/67695/ Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman Othman, Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Electronic data processing. Computer-aided engineering Telecommunication This paper presents the performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code. To calculate the bit error rate, different types of error correcting code were used through an Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel. Three error controls types; Bose- Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH), Cyclic code and hamming code were used as the encoder/decoder technique. Basically, the performance was determined in term of bit rate error (BER) and signal energy to noise power density ratio (Eb/No). Both BPSK and QPSK were also being compared in the symbol error capability known as t in which expected that the performance is graded in response to the increasing of value oft. The maximum codeword length (n) used in the hamming code is 63 and the message length (k) is 57. For BCH code, the maximum N is 63, K is 36 and error-correction capability, t is 5. For cyclic code, the maximum N is 31, K is 21 and error correction capability, t is 5. All simulations were done using MATLAB R2007b software. The results show that the best performance occurs when the communication system uses a BCH code with N=31, K=l 1 and t=5 with BPSK modulator/demodulator. The higher the values of N, K and t, the better the performance of the system using BPSK and QPSK. In general BCH codes are better than Hamming code and Cyclic code for both BPSK and QPSK. 2009 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/67695/1/67695.PDF Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman. (2009) Degree thesis, thesis, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). <http://terminalib.uitm.edu.my/67695.pdf>
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Electronic data processing. Computer-aided engineering
Telecommunication
spellingShingle Electronic data processing. Computer-aided engineering
Telecommunication
Othman, Mohd Hayyul Dltizam
Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman
description This paper presents the performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code. To calculate the bit error rate, different types of error correcting code were used through an Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel. Three error controls types; Bose- Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH), Cyclic code and hamming code were used as the encoder/decoder technique. Basically, the performance was determined in term of bit rate error (BER) and signal energy to noise power density ratio (Eb/No). Both BPSK and QPSK were also being compared in the symbol error capability known as t in which expected that the performance is graded in response to the increasing of value oft. The maximum codeword length (n) used in the hamming code is 63 and the message length (k) is 57. For BCH code, the maximum N is 63, K is 36 and error-correction capability, t is 5. For cyclic code, the maximum N is 31, K is 21 and error correction capability, t is 5. All simulations were done using MATLAB R2007b software. The results show that the best performance occurs when the communication system uses a BCH code with N=31, K=l 1 and t=5 with BPSK modulator/demodulator. The higher the values of N, K and t, the better the performance of the system using BPSK and QPSK. In general BCH codes are better than Hamming code and Cyclic code for both BPSK and QPSK.
format Thesis
author Othman, Mohd Hayyul Dltizam
author_facet Othman, Mohd Hayyul Dltizam
author_sort Othman, Mohd Hayyul Dltizam
title Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman
title_short Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman
title_full Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman
title_fullStr Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman
title_full_unstemmed Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman
title_sort performance analysis of bpsk and qpsk using error correcting code through awgn / mohd hayyul dltizam othman
publishDate 2009
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/67695/1/67695.PDF
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/67695/
_version_ 1814939869394239488
score 13.211869