The QuillBot grammar checker: friend or foe of ESL student writers? / Ho Chui Chui

The use of automated written corrective feedback applications in the writing classroom has been widely researched. However, as the QuillBot grammar checker was newly launched, no studies had been conducted on its accuracy and usability among English as a Second Language (ESL) student writers. To add...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ho, Chui Chui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kedah 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/66534/1/66534.pdf
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/66534/
https://cplt.uitm.edu.my/v1/index.php/journal-volume/volume-10-2022/vol-10-no-1-may-2022
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.66534
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.665342022-09-20T16:42:39Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/66534/ The QuillBot grammar checker: friend or foe of ESL student writers? / Ho Chui Chui Ho, Chui Chui Educational technology Learning. Learning strategies Learning ability The use of automated written corrective feedback applications in the writing classroom has been widely researched. However, as the QuillBot grammar checker was newly launched, no studies had been conducted on its accuracy and usability among English as a Second Language (ESL) student writers. To address this gap, a small-scale sentence- and paragraph-level test was carried out to determine whether it would be a useful tool for ESL students to obtain feedback in real-time instead of waiting for teacher corrective feedback. The new, freely available grammar checker was tested along with the free version of two other popular grammar checking tools, Grammarly and Ginger. Actual writing samples from second-year diploma students were used. The results indicate that the QuillBot grammar checker outperformed the other two software. However, this tool is not perfect and users will still have to manually check for undetected errors and decide if suggestions should be accepted or ignored. Therefore, it is recommended that QuillBot should be used to supplement and not replace teacher feedback. With students using the QuillBot grammar checker in their writing tasks, teachers do not only save time on checking language errors but also have more time to provide feedback regarding global writing concerns, namely, content and organization. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kedah 2022 Article PeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/66534/1/66534.pdf The QuillBot grammar checker: friend or foe of ESL student writers? / Ho Chui Chui. (2022) Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), 10 (1). pp. 10-31. ISSN 1823-464X (Submitted) https://cplt.uitm.edu.my/v1/index.php/journal-volume/volume-10-2022/vol-10-no-1-may-2022
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Educational technology
Learning. Learning strategies
Learning ability
spellingShingle Educational technology
Learning. Learning strategies
Learning ability
Ho, Chui Chui
The QuillBot grammar checker: friend or foe of ESL student writers? / Ho Chui Chui
description The use of automated written corrective feedback applications in the writing classroom has been widely researched. However, as the QuillBot grammar checker was newly launched, no studies had been conducted on its accuracy and usability among English as a Second Language (ESL) student writers. To address this gap, a small-scale sentence- and paragraph-level test was carried out to determine whether it would be a useful tool for ESL students to obtain feedback in real-time instead of waiting for teacher corrective feedback. The new, freely available grammar checker was tested along with the free version of two other popular grammar checking tools, Grammarly and Ginger. Actual writing samples from second-year diploma students were used. The results indicate that the QuillBot grammar checker outperformed the other two software. However, this tool is not perfect and users will still have to manually check for undetected errors and decide if suggestions should be accepted or ignored. Therefore, it is recommended that QuillBot should be used to supplement and not replace teacher feedback. With students using the QuillBot grammar checker in their writing tasks, teachers do not only save time on checking language errors but also have more time to provide feedback regarding global writing concerns, namely, content and organization.
format Article
author Ho, Chui Chui
author_facet Ho, Chui Chui
author_sort Ho, Chui Chui
title The QuillBot grammar checker: friend or foe of ESL student writers? / Ho Chui Chui
title_short The QuillBot grammar checker: friend or foe of ESL student writers? / Ho Chui Chui
title_full The QuillBot grammar checker: friend or foe of ESL student writers? / Ho Chui Chui
title_fullStr The QuillBot grammar checker: friend or foe of ESL student writers? / Ho Chui Chui
title_full_unstemmed The QuillBot grammar checker: friend or foe of ESL student writers? / Ho Chui Chui
title_sort quillbot grammar checker: friend or foe of esl student writers? / ho chui chui
publisher Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kedah
publishDate 2022
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/66534/1/66534.pdf
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/66534/
https://cplt.uitm.edu.my/v1/index.php/journal-volume/volume-10-2022/vol-10-no-1-may-2022
_version_ 1744651640053432320
score 13.160551