Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah
Fuzzy similarity methods have been widely used for decision making in numerous application domain. However, there is lack of specific guideline in choosing the most suitable method thus leading to struggles in solving the problem. T his is particularly true for researcher or user who are not familia...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Student Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/50426/1/50426.pdf https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/50426/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uitm.ir.50426 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.uitm.ir.504262021-09-17T02:33:13Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/50426/ Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah Arippin, Nur Atika Shapian, Nurul Izzah Mohd Hanapiah, Nur Najihah Fuzzy arithmetic Mathematical statistics. Probabilities Data processing Analysis Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems Fuzzy logic Fuzzy similarity methods have been widely used for decision making in numerous application domain. However, there is lack of specific guideline in choosing the most suitable method thus leading to struggles in solving the problem. T his is particularly true for researcher or user who are not familiar with fuzzy similarity methods as they might apply unsuitable method which may lead to unreliable result and possibly invalid outcomes. In this research, Pearson correlation is used to determine the relationship between fuzzy similarity methods.Furthermore, the analytical behavior between methods will be compared and classified. Fourteen methods have been chosen to be a part of the process in computing the fuzzy similarity. Experiments on fuzzy similarity methods had been conducted based on four types of fuzzy sets which are two distinct trapezoidal fuzzy sets, two distinct triangular fuzzy sets, trapezoidal and triangular fuzzy sets and non-convex fuzzy sets. Outcomes from each experiment are analyzed based on graphical analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient.For further validation, the outcomes will be analyzed based on Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).The findings of this research indicate that the fuzzy similarity methods can be classified into three categories which are methods with similar behavior, methods with distinct behavior and methods with opposite behavior. 2018 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/50426/1/50426.pdf ID50426 Arippin, Nur Atika and Shapian, Nurul Izzah and Mohd Hanapiah, Nur Najihah (2018) Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah. [Student Project] (Unpublished) |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Mara |
building |
Tun Abdul Razak Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Mara |
content_source |
UiTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
Fuzzy arithmetic Mathematical statistics. Probabilities Data processing Analysis Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems Fuzzy logic |
spellingShingle |
Fuzzy arithmetic Mathematical statistics. Probabilities Data processing Analysis Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems Fuzzy logic Arippin, Nur Atika Shapian, Nurul Izzah Mohd Hanapiah, Nur Najihah Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah |
description |
Fuzzy similarity methods have been widely used for decision making in numerous application domain. However, there is lack of specific guideline in choosing the most suitable method thus leading to struggles in solving the problem. T his is particularly true for researcher or user who are not familiar with fuzzy similarity methods as they might apply unsuitable method which may lead to unreliable result and possibly invalid outcomes. In this research, Pearson correlation is used to determine the relationship between fuzzy similarity methods.Furthermore, the analytical behavior between methods will be compared and classified. Fourteen methods have been chosen to be a part of the process in computing the fuzzy similarity. Experiments on fuzzy similarity methods had been conducted based on four types of fuzzy sets which are two distinct trapezoidal fuzzy sets, two distinct triangular fuzzy sets, trapezoidal and triangular fuzzy sets and non-convex fuzzy sets. Outcomes from each experiment are analyzed based on graphical analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient.For further validation, the outcomes will be analyzed based on Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).The findings of this research indicate that the fuzzy similarity methods can be classified into three categories which are methods with similar behavior, methods with distinct behavior and methods with opposite behavior. |
format |
Student Project |
author |
Arippin, Nur Atika Shapian, Nurul Izzah Mohd Hanapiah, Nur Najihah |
author_facet |
Arippin, Nur Atika Shapian, Nurul Izzah Mohd Hanapiah, Nur Najihah |
author_sort |
Arippin, Nur Atika |
title |
Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah |
title_short |
Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah |
title_full |
Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah |
title_fullStr |
Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah |
title_sort |
analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / nur atika arippin, nurul izzah shapian and nur najihah mohd hanapiah |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/50426/1/50426.pdf https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/50426/ |
_version_ |
1712288383965855744 |
score |
13.211869 |