Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah

Fuzzy similarity methods have been widely used for decision making in numerous application domain. However, there is lack of specific guideline in choosing the most suitable method thus leading to struggles in solving the problem. T his is particularly true for researcher or user who are not familia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arippin, Nur Atika, Shapian, Nurul Izzah, Mohd Hanapiah, Nur Najihah
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/50426/1/50426.pdf
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/50426/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.50426
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.504262021-09-17T02:33:13Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/50426/ Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah Arippin, Nur Atika Shapian, Nurul Izzah Mohd Hanapiah, Nur Najihah Fuzzy arithmetic Mathematical statistics. Probabilities Data processing Analysis Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems Fuzzy logic Fuzzy similarity methods have been widely used for decision making in numerous application domain. However, there is lack of specific guideline in choosing the most suitable method thus leading to struggles in solving the problem. T his is particularly true for researcher or user who are not familiar with fuzzy similarity methods as they might apply unsuitable method which may lead to unreliable result and possibly invalid outcomes. In this research, Pearson correlation is used to determine the relationship between fuzzy similarity methods.Furthermore, the analytical behavior between methods will be compared and classified. Fourteen methods have been chosen to be a part of the process in computing the fuzzy similarity. Experiments on fuzzy similarity methods had been conducted based on four types of fuzzy sets which are two distinct trapezoidal fuzzy sets, two distinct triangular fuzzy sets, trapezoidal and triangular fuzzy sets and non-convex fuzzy sets. Outcomes from each experiment are analyzed based on graphical analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient.For further validation, the outcomes will be analyzed based on Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).The findings of this research indicate that the fuzzy similarity methods can be classified into three categories which are methods with similar behavior, methods with distinct behavior and methods with opposite behavior. 2018 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/50426/1/50426.pdf ID50426 Arippin, Nur Atika and Shapian, Nurul Izzah and Mohd Hanapiah, Nur Najihah (2018) Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah. [Student Project] (Unpublished)
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Fuzzy arithmetic
Mathematical statistics. Probabilities
Data processing
Analysis
Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems
Fuzzy logic
spellingShingle Fuzzy arithmetic
Mathematical statistics. Probabilities
Data processing
Analysis
Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems
Fuzzy logic
Arippin, Nur Atika
Shapian, Nurul Izzah
Mohd Hanapiah, Nur Najihah
Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah
description Fuzzy similarity methods have been widely used for decision making in numerous application domain. However, there is lack of specific guideline in choosing the most suitable method thus leading to struggles in solving the problem. T his is particularly true for researcher or user who are not familiar with fuzzy similarity methods as they might apply unsuitable method which may lead to unreliable result and possibly invalid outcomes. In this research, Pearson correlation is used to determine the relationship between fuzzy similarity methods.Furthermore, the analytical behavior between methods will be compared and classified. Fourteen methods have been chosen to be a part of the process in computing the fuzzy similarity. Experiments on fuzzy similarity methods had been conducted based on four types of fuzzy sets which are two distinct trapezoidal fuzzy sets, two distinct triangular fuzzy sets, trapezoidal and triangular fuzzy sets and non-convex fuzzy sets. Outcomes from each experiment are analyzed based on graphical analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient.For further validation, the outcomes will be analyzed based on Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).The findings of this research indicate that the fuzzy similarity methods can be classified into three categories which are methods with similar behavior, methods with distinct behavior and methods with opposite behavior.
format Student Project
author Arippin, Nur Atika
Shapian, Nurul Izzah
Mohd Hanapiah, Nur Najihah
author_facet Arippin, Nur Atika
Shapian, Nurul Izzah
Mohd Hanapiah, Nur Najihah
author_sort Arippin, Nur Atika
title Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah
title_short Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah
title_full Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah
title_fullStr Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah
title_full_unstemmed Analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / Nur Atika Arippin, Nurul Izzah Shapian and Nur Najihah Mohd Hanapiah
title_sort analytical comparison of fuzzy similarity methods / nur atika arippin, nurul izzah shapian and nur najihah mohd hanapiah
publishDate 2018
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/50426/1/50426.pdf
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/50426/
_version_ 1712288383965855744
score 13.160551