Differences of attacking pattern in winning and losing team in EURO 2016 / Muhamad Faiq Rusydi Mohd Rosdan

Present study being conducted in order to determine any differences in tenn of attacking pattern between winning and losing teams in EURO 2016. 33 matches were selected excluding the draw matches. Five indicators being choose which were shot on target (outside penalty box, penalty box and goal box a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohd Rosdan, Muhamad Faiq Rusydi
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/46017/1/46017.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/46017/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.46017
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.460172021-05-20T07:42:07Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/46017/ Differences of attacking pattern in winning and losing team in EURO 2016 / Muhamad Faiq Rusydi Mohd Rosdan Mohd Rosdan, Muhamad Faiq Rusydi Statistical data Groups and organizations Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems Present study being conducted in order to determine any differences in tenn of attacking pattern between winning and losing teams in EURO 2016. 33 matches were selected excluding the draw matches. Five indicators being choose which were shot on target (outside penalty box, penalty box and goal box area), area shot on target (six areas have been divided), crossing, goal scoring time and area goals have been scored (six areas have been divided). Mann-Whitney used to prove differences between winning and losing teams with significant value was set at p < 0.05. Shot on target (Z = -3.603, p < 0.05), area shot on target outside penalty box (Z = -3.721, p <0.05), area shot on target goal box (Z = -2.078, p < 0.05). The highest goals scoring was at inside penalty box which were not too near from goal keeper and not too fur from goal post. Area shot on target B (Z = - 2.413, p < 0.05), area shot on target C (Z = -2.992, p < 0.05), area shot on target E (Z = - 2.678, p < 0.05) and area E was the highes shot from the players. Crossing (Z = -2.272, p < 0.05), scoring time 16-30 min (Z = -2.777, p < 0.05), 31-45 min ( Z = -2.749, p < 0.05), 46-60 min (Z = -2. I 74, p < 0.05), 76-90 min (Z = -4.383, p < 0.05) , area goal post A (Z = -2.775, p < 0.05), area goal post C (Z = -1.984, p < 0.05), area goal post D (Z = -3.790, p < 0.05), area goal post E (Z = -3.597, p < 0.05). Area goal post D was the highest goals noted during this toumarnent. The present data can be used by the coaches to conducted the various and specific training program depend on their objectives. 2017 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/46017/1/46017.pdf ID46017 Mohd Rosdan, Muhamad Faiq Rusydi (2017) Differences of attacking pattern in winning and losing team in EURO 2016 / Muhamad Faiq Rusydi Mohd Rosdan. [Student Project] (Unpublished)
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Statistical data
Groups and organizations
Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems
spellingShingle Statistical data
Groups and organizations
Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems
Mohd Rosdan, Muhamad Faiq Rusydi
Differences of attacking pattern in winning and losing team in EURO 2016 / Muhamad Faiq Rusydi Mohd Rosdan
description Present study being conducted in order to determine any differences in tenn of attacking pattern between winning and losing teams in EURO 2016. 33 matches were selected excluding the draw matches. Five indicators being choose which were shot on target (outside penalty box, penalty box and goal box area), area shot on target (six areas have been divided), crossing, goal scoring time and area goals have been scored (six areas have been divided). Mann-Whitney used to prove differences between winning and losing teams with significant value was set at p < 0.05. Shot on target (Z = -3.603, p < 0.05), area shot on target outside penalty box (Z = -3.721, p <0.05), area shot on target goal box (Z = -2.078, p < 0.05). The highest goals scoring was at inside penalty box which were not too near from goal keeper and not too fur from goal post. Area shot on target B (Z = - 2.413, p < 0.05), area shot on target C (Z = -2.992, p < 0.05), area shot on target E (Z = - 2.678, p < 0.05) and area E was the highes shot from the players. Crossing (Z = -2.272, p < 0.05), scoring time 16-30 min (Z = -2.777, p < 0.05), 31-45 min ( Z = -2.749, p < 0.05), 46-60 min (Z = -2. I 74, p < 0.05), 76-90 min (Z = -4.383, p < 0.05) , area goal post A (Z = -2.775, p < 0.05), area goal post C (Z = -1.984, p < 0.05), area goal post D (Z = -3.790, p < 0.05), area goal post E (Z = -3.597, p < 0.05). Area goal post D was the highest goals noted during this toumarnent. The present data can be used by the coaches to conducted the various and specific training program depend on their objectives.
format Student Project
author Mohd Rosdan, Muhamad Faiq Rusydi
author_facet Mohd Rosdan, Muhamad Faiq Rusydi
author_sort Mohd Rosdan, Muhamad Faiq Rusydi
title Differences of attacking pattern in winning and losing team in EURO 2016 / Muhamad Faiq Rusydi Mohd Rosdan
title_short Differences of attacking pattern in winning and losing team in EURO 2016 / Muhamad Faiq Rusydi Mohd Rosdan
title_full Differences of attacking pattern in winning and losing team in EURO 2016 / Muhamad Faiq Rusydi Mohd Rosdan
title_fullStr Differences of attacking pattern in winning and losing team in EURO 2016 / Muhamad Faiq Rusydi Mohd Rosdan
title_full_unstemmed Differences of attacking pattern in winning and losing team in EURO 2016 / Muhamad Faiq Rusydi Mohd Rosdan
title_sort differences of attacking pattern in winning and losing team in euro 2016 / muhamad faiq rusydi mohd rosdan
publishDate 2017
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/46017/1/46017.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/46017/
_version_ 1701165855552831488
score 13.160551