Quantitative versus qualitative : complement or contradiction / Nagarajah Lee

This article discusses methodological pluralism as an alternative approach to conducting research in the social sciences. This discussion arises from fervent debate on quantitative versus qualitative methods that has taken place since the 1960s. The various theories relating to the quantitative and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lee, Nagarajah
Format: Article
Published: Universiti Teknologi MARA Sarawak 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/44862/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.44862
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.448622021-04-07T04:32:40Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/44862/ Quantitative versus qualitative : complement or contradiction / Nagarajah Lee Lee, Nagarajah Research Quantitative research This article discusses methodological pluralism as an alternative approach to conducting research in the social sciences. This discussion arises from fervent debate on quantitative versus qualitative methods that has taken place since the 1960s. The various theories relating to the quantitative and qualitative methodology are highlighted in order to show the reader the root cause of this debate. The strengths as well as the weaknesses of the quantitative and qualitative paradigms are also discussed, to throw light on why the mixed- methodology approach is a crucial issue to discuss. While stressing the unifying process, this article also presents a framework for a mixed methodology method. Finally this article also addresses the various reasons for calling for a mixed methodology approach as well as some criticisms of this move. Universiti Teknologi MARA Sarawak 2003-06 Article PeerReviewed Lee, Nagarajah (2003) Quantitative versus qualitative : complement or contradiction / Nagarajah Lee. Jurnal Akademik. pp. 1-13.
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
topic Research
Quantitative research
spellingShingle Research
Quantitative research
Lee, Nagarajah
Quantitative versus qualitative : complement or contradiction / Nagarajah Lee
description This article discusses methodological pluralism as an alternative approach to conducting research in the social sciences. This discussion arises from fervent debate on quantitative versus qualitative methods that has taken place since the 1960s. The various theories relating to the quantitative and qualitative methodology are highlighted in order to show the reader the root cause of this debate. The strengths as well as the weaknesses of the quantitative and qualitative paradigms are also discussed, to throw light on why the mixed- methodology approach is a crucial issue to discuss. While stressing the unifying process, this article also presents a framework for a mixed methodology method. Finally this article also addresses the various reasons for calling for a mixed methodology approach as well as some criticisms of this move.
format Article
author Lee, Nagarajah
author_facet Lee, Nagarajah
author_sort Lee, Nagarajah
title Quantitative versus qualitative : complement or contradiction / Nagarajah Lee
title_short Quantitative versus qualitative : complement or contradiction / Nagarajah Lee
title_full Quantitative versus qualitative : complement or contradiction / Nagarajah Lee
title_fullStr Quantitative versus qualitative : complement or contradiction / Nagarajah Lee
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative versus qualitative : complement or contradiction / Nagarajah Lee
title_sort quantitative versus qualitative : complement or contradiction / nagarajah lee
publisher Universiti Teknologi MARA Sarawak
publishDate 2003
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/44862/
_version_ 1696979153275846656
score 13.19449