Comparative study of methods for solving the Rubik’s Cube / Nur Syahirah Shuhaimi & Noor Fazlini Mustari

Solving Rubik’s cube can be using software or layer-by-layer human method. This study are to analyze and compare between two different methods for solving Rubik’s cube. Therefore, many researches incline to use layer-by-layer human for solving the Rubik’s cube. Through this project, the study method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuhaimi, Nur Syahirah, Mustari, Noor Fazlini
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39798/1/39798.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39798/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.39798
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.397982020-12-27T05:44:18Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39798/ Comparative study of methods for solving the Rubik’s Cube / Nur Syahirah Shuhaimi & Noor Fazlini Mustari Shuhaimi, Nur Syahirah Mustari, Noor Fazlini Elementary mathematics. Arithmetic Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems Algorithms Solving Rubik’s cube can be using software or layer-by-layer human method. This study are to analyze and compare between two different methods for solving Rubik’s cube. Therefore, many researches incline to use layer-by-layer human for solving the Rubik’s cube. Through this project, the study method of layer-by-layer human which are Fridrich and ZZ method are being applied. Moreover, this project is focusing more on Fridrich method in finding the best time taken for solving the Rubik’s cube rather than ZZ method. The factors that were considered are the minimum, maximum and average of the moves and times of Fridrich Method (CFOP) requires for solving Rubik’s Cube, how many moves and times to solve per algorithm. The mathematics behind the steps for solving Rubik’s cube are observed. Besides, from the observation, there are commutative, conjugate, association and inverse through random jumble of Rubik’s cube. Since the efficiency were factored by move and time of each method by several algorithms, the movement of each method of several algorithms will be determined the efficiency for solving the Rubik’s Cube. The conclusion, the data of moves and times by Fridrich Method (CFOP) were collected from beginner. For each several algorithms that are going to compare between Fridrich Method (CFOP) and ZZ Method will determine the best method for solving the Rubik’s Cube. From the result, the ZZ method is the most efficiency and the best method for solving the Rubik’s cube which is, 102.30s compared to Fridrich method which is, 146.20s. 2019-07 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39798/1/39798.pdf Shuhaimi, Nur Syahirah and Mustari, Noor Fazlini (2019) Comparative study of methods for solving the Rubik’s Cube / Nur Syahirah Shuhaimi & Noor Fazlini Mustari. Degree thesis, Universiti Teknologi MARA.
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Elementary mathematics. Arithmetic
Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems
Algorithms
spellingShingle Elementary mathematics. Arithmetic
Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems
Algorithms
Shuhaimi, Nur Syahirah
Mustari, Noor Fazlini
Comparative study of methods for solving the Rubik’s Cube / Nur Syahirah Shuhaimi & Noor Fazlini Mustari
description Solving Rubik’s cube can be using software or layer-by-layer human method. This study are to analyze and compare between two different methods for solving Rubik’s cube. Therefore, many researches incline to use layer-by-layer human for solving the Rubik’s cube. Through this project, the study method of layer-by-layer human which are Fridrich and ZZ method are being applied. Moreover, this project is focusing more on Fridrich method in finding the best time taken for solving the Rubik’s cube rather than ZZ method. The factors that were considered are the minimum, maximum and average of the moves and times of Fridrich Method (CFOP) requires for solving Rubik’s Cube, how many moves and times to solve per algorithm. The mathematics behind the steps for solving Rubik’s cube are observed. Besides, from the observation, there are commutative, conjugate, association and inverse through random jumble of Rubik’s cube. Since the efficiency were factored by move and time of each method by several algorithms, the movement of each method of several algorithms will be determined the efficiency for solving the Rubik’s Cube. The conclusion, the data of moves and times by Fridrich Method (CFOP) were collected from beginner. For each several algorithms that are going to compare between Fridrich Method (CFOP) and ZZ Method will determine the best method for solving the Rubik’s Cube. From the result, the ZZ method is the most efficiency and the best method for solving the Rubik’s cube which is, 102.30s compared to Fridrich method which is, 146.20s.
format Thesis
author Shuhaimi, Nur Syahirah
Mustari, Noor Fazlini
author_facet Shuhaimi, Nur Syahirah
Mustari, Noor Fazlini
author_sort Shuhaimi, Nur Syahirah
title Comparative study of methods for solving the Rubik’s Cube / Nur Syahirah Shuhaimi & Noor Fazlini Mustari
title_short Comparative study of methods for solving the Rubik’s Cube / Nur Syahirah Shuhaimi & Noor Fazlini Mustari
title_full Comparative study of methods for solving the Rubik’s Cube / Nur Syahirah Shuhaimi & Noor Fazlini Mustari
title_fullStr Comparative study of methods for solving the Rubik’s Cube / Nur Syahirah Shuhaimi & Noor Fazlini Mustari
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of methods for solving the Rubik’s Cube / Nur Syahirah Shuhaimi & Noor Fazlini Mustari
title_sort comparative study of methods for solving the rubik’s cube / nur syahirah shuhaimi & noor fazlini mustari
publishDate 2019
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39798/1/39798.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39798/
_version_ 1687396813137510400
score 13.159267