Performance comparison test of conventional and metamaterial antenna / Farawahida Ahmad Ramli

In this paper, the performance of conventional and metamaterial antennas (microstrip rectangular patch antenna with V-shape and using Circular Ring defected ground structure and rectangular microstrip patch antenna with nine squares of Electromagnetic Band Gap (EBG) structure on the ground plane) in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmad Ramli, Farawahida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2015
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39790/1/39790.pdf
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39790/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.39790
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.397902023-08-29T08:31:50Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39790/ Performance comparison test of conventional and metamaterial antenna / Farawahida Ahmad Ramli Ahmad Ramli, Farawahida In this paper, the performance of conventional and metamaterial antennas (microstrip rectangular patch antenna with V-shape and using Circular Ring defected ground structure and rectangular microstrip patch antenna with nine squares of Electromagnetic Band Gap (EBG) structure on the ground plane) in Wi-Fi application which having the frequency of 2.45GHz is tested. The performance and distance coverage is determined after testing done by AirMax Bullet M2 Hp and software AirMax AirOS by Ubiquiti Networks. The scope of project includes recording time duration to transfer small-size of video (16.6Mb) and medium-sized movie (369Mb) files from a local to remote host by varying output power of the transceiver, distance and type of antennas at both transmitting and receiving ends. The performance of the conventional antenna is better than metamaterial antenna. At 20 meter, both antenna is still working with the same signal strength - 58 dBm but conventional antenna have higher transfer rate and shorter time taken to transfer files compare to metamaterial antenna. As for two metamaterial antenna tested, it is conclude that EBG antenna is better than DGS antenna because of it higher signal strength and time taken to transfer file is shorter compare to DGS antenna which is 7.83 second (16.6Mb) and 143 second (369Mb) for DGS antenna and 5.7 second (16.6Mb) and 143 second (369Mb) for EBG antenna. This result will help to add market value to antenna tested. 2015 Article NonPeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39790/1/39790.pdf Performance comparison test of conventional and metamaterial antenna / Farawahida Ahmad Ramli. (2015) pp. 1-10. (Unpublished)
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
description In this paper, the performance of conventional and metamaterial antennas (microstrip rectangular patch antenna with V-shape and using Circular Ring defected ground structure and rectangular microstrip patch antenna with nine squares of Electromagnetic Band Gap (EBG) structure on the ground plane) in Wi-Fi application which having the frequency of 2.45GHz is tested. The performance and distance coverage is determined after testing done by AirMax Bullet M2 Hp and software AirMax AirOS by Ubiquiti Networks. The scope of project includes recording time duration to transfer small-size of video (16.6Mb) and medium-sized movie (369Mb) files from a local to remote host by varying output power of the transceiver, distance and type of antennas at both transmitting and receiving ends. The performance of the conventional antenna is better than metamaterial antenna. At 20 meter, both antenna is still working with the same signal strength - 58 dBm but conventional antenna have higher transfer rate and shorter time taken to transfer files compare to metamaterial antenna. As for two metamaterial antenna tested, it is conclude that EBG antenna is better than DGS antenna because of it higher signal strength and time taken to transfer file is shorter compare to DGS antenna which is 7.83 second (16.6Mb) and 143 second (369Mb) for DGS antenna and 5.7 second (16.6Mb) and 143 second (369Mb) for EBG antenna. This result will help to add market value to antenna tested.
format Article
author Ahmad Ramli, Farawahida
spellingShingle Ahmad Ramli, Farawahida
Performance comparison test of conventional and metamaterial antenna / Farawahida Ahmad Ramli
author_facet Ahmad Ramli, Farawahida
author_sort Ahmad Ramli, Farawahida
title Performance comparison test of conventional and metamaterial antenna / Farawahida Ahmad Ramli
title_short Performance comparison test of conventional and metamaterial antenna / Farawahida Ahmad Ramli
title_full Performance comparison test of conventional and metamaterial antenna / Farawahida Ahmad Ramli
title_fullStr Performance comparison test of conventional and metamaterial antenna / Farawahida Ahmad Ramli
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparison test of conventional and metamaterial antenna / Farawahida Ahmad Ramli
title_sort performance comparison test of conventional and metamaterial antenna / farawahida ahmad ramli
publishDate 2015
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39790/1/39790.pdf
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39790/
_version_ 1776250533495963648
score 13.189131