Participative budgeting: the effects of budget emphasis, information asymmetry and procedural justice on slack - additional evidence / Vincent K Chong and Raymon Strauss

This study re-examines the results presented in Lau and Eggleton (Accounting and Business Research, 2003, pp. 91-104) regarding the influence of information asymmetry and budget emphasis on the relationship between budgetary participation and budgetary slack hold based on a different sample. In addi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K Chong, Vincent, Strauss, Raymon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam: Accounting Research Institute (ARI) 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/29944/1/29944.pdf
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/29944/
https://apmaj.uitm.edu.my/index.php/archive
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.29944
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.299442022-07-05T06:19:28Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/29944/ Participative budgeting: the effects of budget emphasis, information asymmetry and procedural justice on slack - additional evidence / Vincent K Chong and Raymon Strauss K Chong, Vincent Strauss, Raymon Financial management. Business finance. Corporation finance This study re-examines the results presented in Lau and Eggleton (Accounting and Business Research, 2003, pp. 91-104) regarding the influence of information asymmetry and budget emphasis on the relationship between budgetary participation and budgetary slack hold based on a different sample. In addition, this study extends Lau and Eggleton’s research model by incorporating procedural justice as an additional moderating variable. A survey research methodology was used to collect data. Participants consisted of 116 managers from Australian manufacturing firms listed in the Who's Who in Business in Australia database. The results indicate that subordinates’ propensity to create budgetary slack is low when budgetary participation, information asymmetry and budget emphasis are all high. In addition, the results reveal that in high budget emphasis and high information asymmetry situations, subordinates’ propensity to create budgetary slack is low when budgetary participation and procedural justice are high. This study contributes to the existing knowledge by generating both theoretical and practical implications to improve budgetary control systems within organizations. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam: Accounting Research Institute (ARI) 2017-06 Article PeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/29944/1/29944.pdf Participative budgeting: the effects of budget emphasis, information asymmetry and procedural justice on slack - additional evidence / Vincent K Chong and Raymon Strauss. (2017) Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal (APMAJ), 12 (1). pp. 181-220. ISSN 2550-1631 https://apmaj.uitm.edu.my/index.php/archive
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Financial management. Business finance. Corporation finance
spellingShingle Financial management. Business finance. Corporation finance
K Chong, Vincent
Strauss, Raymon
Participative budgeting: the effects of budget emphasis, information asymmetry and procedural justice on slack - additional evidence / Vincent K Chong and Raymon Strauss
description This study re-examines the results presented in Lau and Eggleton (Accounting and Business Research, 2003, pp. 91-104) regarding the influence of information asymmetry and budget emphasis on the relationship between budgetary participation and budgetary slack hold based on a different sample. In addition, this study extends Lau and Eggleton’s research model by incorporating procedural justice as an additional moderating variable. A survey research methodology was used to collect data. Participants consisted of 116 managers from Australian manufacturing firms listed in the Who's Who in Business in Australia database. The results indicate that subordinates’ propensity to create budgetary slack is low when budgetary participation, information asymmetry and budget emphasis are all high. In addition, the results reveal that in high budget emphasis and high information asymmetry situations, subordinates’ propensity to create budgetary slack is low when budgetary participation and procedural justice are high. This study contributes to the existing knowledge by generating both theoretical and practical implications to improve budgetary control systems within organizations.
format Article
author K Chong, Vincent
Strauss, Raymon
author_facet K Chong, Vincent
Strauss, Raymon
author_sort K Chong, Vincent
title Participative budgeting: the effects of budget emphasis, information asymmetry and procedural justice on slack - additional evidence / Vincent K Chong and Raymon Strauss
title_short Participative budgeting: the effects of budget emphasis, information asymmetry and procedural justice on slack - additional evidence / Vincent K Chong and Raymon Strauss
title_full Participative budgeting: the effects of budget emphasis, information asymmetry and procedural justice on slack - additional evidence / Vincent K Chong and Raymon Strauss
title_fullStr Participative budgeting: the effects of budget emphasis, information asymmetry and procedural justice on slack - additional evidence / Vincent K Chong and Raymon Strauss
title_full_unstemmed Participative budgeting: the effects of budget emphasis, information asymmetry and procedural justice on slack - additional evidence / Vincent K Chong and Raymon Strauss
title_sort participative budgeting: the effects of budget emphasis, information asymmetry and procedural justice on slack - additional evidence / vincent k chong and raymon strauss
publisher Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam: Accounting Research Institute (ARI)
publishDate 2017
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/29944/1/29944.pdf
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/29944/
https://apmaj.uitm.edu.my/index.php/archive
_version_ 1738513865254109184
score 13.211869