Evaluation of energy uses for two types of holing method / Muhammad Ridhwan Suhaimi

The replanting operation of an oil palm as a whole need to meet the timeline provided. As holing is one of the processes in replanting operation, it is also important to complete it on time. Holing can be done either manually or mechanically. This study was conducted to evaluate the energy uses in t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Suhaimi, Muhammad Ridhwan
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/24314/1/24314.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/24314/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.24314
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.243142020-08-11T04:52:24Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/24314/ Evaluation of energy uses for two types of holing method / Muhammad Ridhwan Suhaimi Suhaimi, Muhammad Ridhwan S Agriculture (General) Agricultural machinery. Farm machinery Energy consumption The replanting operation of an oil palm as a whole need to meet the timeline provided. As holing is one of the processes in replanting operation, it is also important to complete it on time. Holing can be done either manually or mechanically. This study was conducted to evaluate the energy uses in two types of holing methods. Other than energy, the working performance over time and cost that involved in both methods was also evaluated. The data is taken at FGV Tembangau 7. The parameter taken was the food consumption of the labor, the amount of fuel used by the tractor, the area covered within a time, and the cost that involved the two methods of holing. The data then been analyzed using a formula to determine the energy usage. The result showed that the energy consumption by the labor which taken from the energy content of each food they eat is 6.388 MJ and the amount of fuel used by the tractor is 244.20 MJ. The labor can covered 0.72 hectare per day and the auger can covered 3.26 hectare in the same working hour. The cost of paying labor wages is RM 70 per day where the cost of using mechanically is RM 495 per day. It can be concluded that mechanical method is better than manual method. Many companies can use this case study to gain information and to make decision in choosing which method they could use in their plantation. Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology 2017 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/24314/1/24314.pdf Suhaimi, Muhammad Ridhwan (2017) Evaluation of energy uses for two types of holing method / Muhammad Ridhwan Suhaimi. [Student Project] (Unpublished)
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic S Agriculture (General)
Agricultural machinery. Farm machinery
Energy consumption
spellingShingle S Agriculture (General)
Agricultural machinery. Farm machinery
Energy consumption
Suhaimi, Muhammad Ridhwan
Evaluation of energy uses for two types of holing method / Muhammad Ridhwan Suhaimi
description The replanting operation of an oil palm as a whole need to meet the timeline provided. As holing is one of the processes in replanting operation, it is also important to complete it on time. Holing can be done either manually or mechanically. This study was conducted to evaluate the energy uses in two types of holing methods. Other than energy, the working performance over time and cost that involved in both methods was also evaluated. The data is taken at FGV Tembangau 7. The parameter taken was the food consumption of the labor, the amount of fuel used by the tractor, the area covered within a time, and the cost that involved the two methods of holing. The data then been analyzed using a formula to determine the energy usage. The result showed that the energy consumption by the labor which taken from the energy content of each food they eat is 6.388 MJ and the amount of fuel used by the tractor is 244.20 MJ. The labor can covered 0.72 hectare per day and the auger can covered 3.26 hectare in the same working hour. The cost of paying labor wages is RM 70 per day where the cost of using mechanically is RM 495 per day. It can be concluded that mechanical method is better than manual method. Many companies can use this case study to gain information and to make decision in choosing which method they could use in their plantation.
format Student Project
author Suhaimi, Muhammad Ridhwan
author_facet Suhaimi, Muhammad Ridhwan
author_sort Suhaimi, Muhammad Ridhwan
title Evaluation of energy uses for two types of holing method / Muhammad Ridhwan Suhaimi
title_short Evaluation of energy uses for two types of holing method / Muhammad Ridhwan Suhaimi
title_full Evaluation of energy uses for two types of holing method / Muhammad Ridhwan Suhaimi
title_fullStr Evaluation of energy uses for two types of holing method / Muhammad Ridhwan Suhaimi
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of energy uses for two types of holing method / Muhammad Ridhwan Suhaimi
title_sort evaluation of energy uses for two types of holing method / muhammad ridhwan suhaimi
publisher Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology
publishDate 2017
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/24314/1/24314.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/24314/
_version_ 1685649841876631552
score 13.211869