Plagiarism Detection Systems : An Evaluation Of Several Systems

In the Open University environment where students are not centrally located and are not under any direct supervision the potential for plagiarism definitely exists. The very technology that facilitates open learning also allows easy exchange of papers among peers. Students can also easily access...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmad Hashem,
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Published: 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://library.oum.edu.my/repository/139/1/plagiarism_detaction_system.pdf
http://library.oum.edu.my/repository/139/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.oum.139
record_format eprints
spelling my.oum.1392013-07-18T08:15:13Z Plagiarism Detection Systems : An Evaluation Of Several Systems Ahmad Hashem, LC5201 Education extension. Adult education. Continuing education In the Open University environment where students are not centrally located and are not under any direct supervision the potential for plagiarism definitely exists. The very technology that facilitates open learning also allows easy exchange of papers among peers. Students can also easily access “paper-mills” where essays can be quickly customized to suit requirements, for a fee. There is also the vast information residing on the Internet ready for creative reuse. In the light of all these temptations the Open University of Malaysia (OUM) is exploring the use of technology to educate students and deter plagiarism. One approach that appears promising is to use a good commercial plagiarism detection system. The system, by being able to detect cases of plagiarism would serve as a deterrent and hopefully contribute towards inculcating the culture of honesty. This paper presents the findings from a small study using two detection systems, a commercial Plagiarism Detection System, MyDropBox and a simple and free automatic file comparison system, Pl@giarism. The results show that while the automatic system is very useful, the simple and free system can be adequate for most purposes. Recommendations on a suitable system for the OUM context are then made based on these findings. (Author's abstract) 2006-09-05 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed text http://library.oum.edu.my/repository/139/1/plagiarism_detaction_system.pdf Ahmad Hashem, (2006) Plagiarism Detection Systems : An Evaluation Of Several Systems. In: The 6th SEAAIR Annual Conference 2006, 5-7 September 2006, Langkawi. http://library.oum.edu.my/repository/139/
institution Open University Malaysia
building OUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Open University Malaysia
content_source OUM Knowledge Repository
url_provider http://library.oum.edu.my/repository/
topic LC5201 Education extension. Adult education. Continuing education
spellingShingle LC5201 Education extension. Adult education. Continuing education
Ahmad Hashem,
Plagiarism Detection Systems : An Evaluation Of Several Systems
description In the Open University environment where students are not centrally located and are not under any direct supervision the potential for plagiarism definitely exists. The very technology that facilitates open learning also allows easy exchange of papers among peers. Students can also easily access “paper-mills” where essays can be quickly customized to suit requirements, for a fee. There is also the vast information residing on the Internet ready for creative reuse. In the light of all these temptations the Open University of Malaysia (OUM) is exploring the use of technology to educate students and deter plagiarism. One approach that appears promising is to use a good commercial plagiarism detection system. The system, by being able to detect cases of plagiarism would serve as a deterrent and hopefully contribute towards inculcating the culture of honesty. This paper presents the findings from a small study using two detection systems, a commercial Plagiarism Detection System, MyDropBox and a simple and free automatic file comparison system, Pl@giarism. The results show that while the automatic system is very useful, the simple and free system can be adequate for most purposes. Recommendations on a suitable system for the OUM context are then made based on these findings. (Author's abstract)
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Ahmad Hashem,
author_facet Ahmad Hashem,
author_sort Ahmad Hashem,
title Plagiarism Detection Systems : An Evaluation Of Several Systems
title_short Plagiarism Detection Systems : An Evaluation Of Several Systems
title_full Plagiarism Detection Systems : An Evaluation Of Several Systems
title_fullStr Plagiarism Detection Systems : An Evaluation Of Several Systems
title_full_unstemmed Plagiarism Detection Systems : An Evaluation Of Several Systems
title_sort plagiarism detection systems : an evaluation of several systems
publishDate 2006
url http://library.oum.edu.my/repository/139/1/plagiarism_detaction_system.pdf
http://library.oum.edu.my/repository/139/
_version_ 1644308876995067904
score 13.214268