Performance comparison between predictive functional control and PID algorithms for an automobile cruise control system

This work presents a performance comparison between a Predictive Functional Control (PFC) and a traditional Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller specifically for a cruise control application. The tuning efficacy, constraints handling, and disturbance rejection features of both controlle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque, Abdullah, Muhammad, Ahmad, Salmiah, Tofrowaih, Khairul Amri
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: UMP 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/96813/1/96813_Performance%20comparison%20between%20predictive%20functional.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/96813/7/96813_Performance%20comparison%20between%20predictive%20functional_SCOPUS.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/96813/
https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijame/article/view/6848
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.96813
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.968132023-05-08T01:23:08Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/96813/ Performance comparison between predictive functional control and PID algorithms for an automobile cruise control system Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque Abdullah, Muhammad Ahmad, Salmiah Tofrowaih, Khairul Amri TJ212 Control engineering This work presents a performance comparison between a Predictive Functional Control (PFC) and a traditional Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller specifically for a cruise control application. The tuning efficacy, constraints handling, and disturbance rejection features of both controllers are analysed by comparing their closed-loop response. A simplified nonlinear vehicle longitudinal dynamics model is derived and utilised as a plant to simulate the control response from a real car. For a fair comparison, both PFC and PID are tuned to achieve the similar desired closed-loop time response. Qualitatively, the results show that PFC provides a better closed-loop response, constraints handling, and disturbance rejection compared to PID. Besides, it is also found out that the tuning approach of PFC is more intuitive and practical in nature which can be very handy for future development of an autonomous cruise control application. UMP 2022-03-24 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/96813/1/96813_Performance%20comparison%20between%20predictive%20functional.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/96813/7/96813_Performance%20comparison%20between%20predictive%20functional_SCOPUS.pdf Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque and Abdullah, Muhammad and Ahmad, Salmiah and Tofrowaih, Khairul Amri (2022) Performance comparison between predictive functional control and PID algorithms for an automobile cruise control system. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, 19 (1). pp. 9460-9468. ISSN 2229-8649 E-ISSN 2180-1606 https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijame/article/view/6848 10.15282/ijame.19.1.2022.09.0728
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
English
topic TJ212 Control engineering
spellingShingle TJ212 Control engineering
Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque
Abdullah, Muhammad
Ahmad, Salmiah
Tofrowaih, Khairul Amri
Performance comparison between predictive functional control and PID algorithms for an automobile cruise control system
description This work presents a performance comparison between a Predictive Functional Control (PFC) and a traditional Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller specifically for a cruise control application. The tuning efficacy, constraints handling, and disturbance rejection features of both controllers are analysed by comparing their closed-loop response. A simplified nonlinear vehicle longitudinal dynamics model is derived and utilised as a plant to simulate the control response from a real car. For a fair comparison, both PFC and PID are tuned to achieve the similar desired closed-loop time response. Qualitatively, the results show that PFC provides a better closed-loop response, constraints handling, and disturbance rejection compared to PID. Besides, it is also found out that the tuning approach of PFC is more intuitive and practical in nature which can be very handy for future development of an autonomous cruise control application.
format Article
author Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque
Abdullah, Muhammad
Ahmad, Salmiah
Tofrowaih, Khairul Amri
author_facet Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque
Abdullah, Muhammad
Ahmad, Salmiah
Tofrowaih, Khairul Amri
author_sort Zainuddin, Mohamed Al-Sideque
title Performance comparison between predictive functional control and PID algorithms for an automobile cruise control system
title_short Performance comparison between predictive functional control and PID algorithms for an automobile cruise control system
title_full Performance comparison between predictive functional control and PID algorithms for an automobile cruise control system
title_fullStr Performance comparison between predictive functional control and PID algorithms for an automobile cruise control system
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparison between predictive functional control and PID algorithms for an automobile cruise control system
title_sort performance comparison between predictive functional control and pid algorithms for an automobile cruise control system
publisher UMP
publishDate 2022
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/96813/1/96813_Performance%20comparison%20between%20predictive%20functional.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/96813/7/96813_Performance%20comparison%20between%20predictive%20functional_SCOPUS.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/96813/
https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijame/article/view/6848
_version_ 1768006366760271872
score 13.160551