Revisiting far/near infrared pyramid-based fusion types for night vision using matlab

The night vision imaging mechanisms are developed to increase the visibility beyond normal human perception capabilities. So far, night vision methods reported in literature, such as, Morphological, Low Pass Pyramid, Contrast Pyramid, Filter Subtract Decimate and Shift Invariant methods, the Laplaci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehfooz, Osama, Shah, Asadullah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Caxton Printing Press 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/9417/1/9417.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/9417/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.9417
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.94172021-01-18T07:50:09Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/9417/ Revisiting far/near infrared pyramid-based fusion types for night vision using matlab Mehfooz, Osama Shah, Asadullah QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science The night vision imaging mechanisms are developed to increase the visibility beyond normal human perception capabilities. So far, night vision methods reported in literature, such as, Morphological, Low Pass Pyramid, Contrast Pyramid, Filter Subtract Decimate and Shift Invariant methods, the Laplacian fusion method has been rated, the best method [1][2]. In this research paper four different methods of fusion of images, Gradient, Wavelet, Quincuns Lifting, including Laplacian are processed using Matlab toolbox called Matifus for night vision. For comparing the results of processed images using above methods, Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is used. MOS result of Laplacian, wavelet, gradient and quincunx methods are compared. The MOS results on the scale of 1-5 indicate a score of 4.15 for Laplacian, that means the quality of image perceived by the scorers is rated between good and excellent. By using MOS and perceptually proving that Laplacian technique is better than all others for night vision systems. However Gradient scored 3.56, Wavelet scored 3.15 and lastly 2.22 was scored by Quincunx Lifting method. Key terms: FIR-Far Infrared, NIR-Near Infrared, Night Vision, Sensors-K-Kelvin, Micron, Optical Light, Mean Opinion Score (MOS). Caxton Printing Press 2011-05 Article NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/9417/1/9417.pdf Mehfooz, Osama and Shah, Asadullah (2011) Revisiting far/near infrared pyramid-based fusion types for night vision using matlab. Pakistan Journal of Engineering Technology & Science (PJETS), 1 (1). pp. 21-36. ISSN 1995-1302
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Mehfooz, Osama
Shah, Asadullah
Revisiting far/near infrared pyramid-based fusion types for night vision using matlab
description The night vision imaging mechanisms are developed to increase the visibility beyond normal human perception capabilities. So far, night vision methods reported in literature, such as, Morphological, Low Pass Pyramid, Contrast Pyramid, Filter Subtract Decimate and Shift Invariant methods, the Laplacian fusion method has been rated, the best method [1][2]. In this research paper four different methods of fusion of images, Gradient, Wavelet, Quincuns Lifting, including Laplacian are processed using Matlab toolbox called Matifus for night vision. For comparing the results of processed images using above methods, Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is used. MOS result of Laplacian, wavelet, gradient and quincunx methods are compared. The MOS results on the scale of 1-5 indicate a score of 4.15 for Laplacian, that means the quality of image perceived by the scorers is rated between good and excellent. By using MOS and perceptually proving that Laplacian technique is better than all others for night vision systems. However Gradient scored 3.56, Wavelet scored 3.15 and lastly 2.22 was scored by Quincunx Lifting method. Key terms: FIR-Far Infrared, NIR-Near Infrared, Night Vision, Sensors-K-Kelvin, Micron, Optical Light, Mean Opinion Score (MOS).
format Article
author Mehfooz, Osama
Shah, Asadullah
author_facet Mehfooz, Osama
Shah, Asadullah
author_sort Mehfooz, Osama
title Revisiting far/near infrared pyramid-based fusion types for night vision using matlab
title_short Revisiting far/near infrared pyramid-based fusion types for night vision using matlab
title_full Revisiting far/near infrared pyramid-based fusion types for night vision using matlab
title_fullStr Revisiting far/near infrared pyramid-based fusion types for night vision using matlab
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting far/near infrared pyramid-based fusion types for night vision using matlab
title_sort revisiting far/near infrared pyramid-based fusion types for night vision using matlab
publisher Caxton Printing Press
publishDate 2011
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/9417/1/9417.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/9417/
_version_ 1690370695428571136
score 13.188404