Impact of expansion level on flowfield with sudden expansion at supersonic regimes
This paper aims to assess the control mechanism’s efficiency and flow pattern in the pipe. The flow was investigated for Mach numbers M = 1.25, 1.3, 1.48, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 for a step height of 3 mm. The NPRs of the tests were from 11 to 3. The flow revealed the minimum duct requirement fo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English English English |
Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/92647/7/92647_Impact%20of%20expansion%20level%20on%20flowfield.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/92647/8/92647_Impact%20of%20expansion%20level%20on%20flowfield_Scopus.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/92647/9/92647_Impact%20of%20expansion%20level%20on%20flowfield_WoS.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/92647/ https://www.journals.elsevier.com/materials-today-proceedings |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This paper aims to assess the control mechanism’s efficiency and flow pattern in the pipe. The flow was investigated for Mach numbers M = 1.25, 1.3, 1.48, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 for a step height of 3 mm. The NPRs of the tests were from 11 to 3. The flow revealed the minimum duct requirement for a given Mach number and NPR as L = 2D. Only some selected cases where the control mechanism impacts considerably are presented. In most of the cases, the flow field was the same. There is a reversal in control in the flow field; only such cases are discussed. At low Mach numbers, the flow regulator raises the pressure, and for the rest of the Mach numbers, t |
---|