Magnitudes of households’ carbon footprint in Iskandar Malaysia: Policy implications for sustainable development
The carbon footprint of households is a significant contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for 24% of total emissions. As a result, it is critical to quantify a household’s carbon footprint in order to reduce it over time. One of the best ways to measure carbon emitted from...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/91049/1/91049_Magnitudes%20of%20households%E2%80%99%20carbon%20footprint%20in%20Iskandar%20Malaysia.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/91049/2/91049_Magnitudes%20of%20households%E2%80%99%20carbon%20footprint%20in%20Iskandar%20Malaysia_SCOPUS.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/91049/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652621022605 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128042 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The carbon footprint of households is a significant contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions, accounting
for 24% of total emissions. As a result, it is critical to quantify a household’s carbon footprint in order to reduce it
over time. One of the best ways to measure carbon emitted from various sectors of the economy, including
household daily activities, is to calculate a country’s carbon footprint (CF). This study statistically examined the
magnitude of households’ carbon footprints and their relationships with household daily activities and certain
socio-economic demographic variables in Malaysia. Results revealed that the average household carbon footprint
amounted to 11.76 t-CO2. The average also showed that the primary carbon footprint, 7.02 t-CO2 or 59.69% was
higher compared to the secondary carbon footprint which was 4.73 t- CO2 or 40.22% and assessment revealed
significant differences among household types. The largest carbon footprint was evident in a medium-high cost
urban area, estimated at 20.14 t-CO2, while the carbon footprint found in a rural area was 9.58 t-CO2. In the
latter, the primary carbon footprint was almost double the figure of 5.84 t-CO2 (61%) than the secondary carbon
footprint of 3.73 t-CO2 (39%). The study reveals a higher carbon footprint in urban areas compared to rural ones
depicting the effects of urbanisation and urban sprawl on household lifestyles and carbon footprints. Despite
some limitations, the findings of this study will help policymakers design and implement stronger policies that
enforce low-carbon activities and energy-saving goods and services in order to reduce urban Malaysia’s carbon
footprint dramatically. |
---|