Constitutional supremacy and the rule of law: the emergence of constitutional oath doctrine
The Malaysian legal system has often been mistakenly perceived as following the parliamentary supremacy similar to the United Kingdom (UK). In fact, Malaysia practices constitutional supremacy which is fundamentally different from the UK’s legal system. The Malaysia Federal Constitution requires t...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , , |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | مقال |
| اللغة: | English |
| منشور في: |
Lexis Nexis Malaysia Sdn Bhd
2021
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/90668/7/90668_Constitutional%20supremacy%20and%20the%20rule%20of%20law%20the%20emergence%20of%20constitutional%20oath%20doctrine.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/90668/ https://advance-lexis-com.ezlib.iium.edu.my/toc/?crid=0f46d6a1-2c84-49d1-9160-6fd6da376ccf&prid=89b97c3c-9b48-4346-b7f5-66303c301b17&pdfilterstring=MTA5MTg1Mg&pdtocfullpath=%2fshared%2ftableofcontents%2furn%3acontentItem%3a5RBG-6P41-FG58-S000-00000-00&ecomp=gzxdkdk&earg=878383543 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| الملخص: | The Malaysian legal system has often been mistakenly perceived as following the parliamentary supremacy
similar to the United Kingdom (UK). In fact, Malaysia practices constitutional supremacy which is fundamentally
different from the UK’s legal system. The Malaysia Federal Constitution requires the judges of the superior courts
to take ‘oath of office and allegiance’ before holding the office. On the basis of this, some commentators
developed the ‘Constitutional Oath doctrine’ in which the judiciary is entrusted with the supreme policing authority
under the Federal Constitution in upholding the rule of law. Accordingly, this article aims at evaluating the
development and feasibility of this doctrine in the Malaysian legal system. It is submitted that this doctrine suited
well within the Malaysian legal system which practices constitutional supremacy. This doctrine was expounded
by Dr. Hamid Sultan, Court of Appeal Judge, which the learned judge has incorporated in more than 40 of his
judgements. So far, this doctrine has neither been overruled nor disapproved by the apex court. Besides, it has
received numerous positive reviews from both local and foreign prominent constitutional law experts. |
|---|