Experimental and numerical investigation of expansion corner effects on isolator performance

In the present study, the effect of the expansion corner on the suddenly expanded flow process has been studied. Experimental investigations have been carried out on a convergent-divergent (C-D) nozzle and isolator duct, where the expansion of the channel is formed through the presence of a 1, 2, an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Quadros, Jaimon Dennis, Khan, Sher Afghan, T., Prashanth
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/83922/7/83922_Experimental%20and%20numerical%20edited.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/83922/8/83922_Experimental%20and%20numerical%20investigation%20of%20expansion%20corner%20effects%20on%20isolator%20performance%20_%20SCOPUS.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/83922/
https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/tjj/ahead-of-print/article-10.1515-tjeng-2020-0032/article-10.1515-tjeng-2020-0032.xml
https://doi.org/10.1515/tjeng-2020-0032
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the present study, the effect of the expansion corner on the suddenly expanded flow process has been studied. Experimental investigations have been carried out on a convergent-divergent (C-D) nozzle and isolator duct, where the expansion of the channel is formed through the presence of a 1, 2, and 3 expansion corners (EC) respectively. Flow from nozzle exit of the nozzle of Mach, M = 2.0 was suddenly expanded into the axi-symmetric duct having a cross-sectional area of 4.84 times the nozzle exit area. The wall static pressure along the length of the duct and the Pitot pressure at the exit plane of the duct was measured for all the configurations. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) the technique was employed for visualizing the shock train in the expanded duct. The isolator with one expansion a corner was found to be more efficient in achieving a high static pressure rise. The experimental and numerical wall static pressure distribution values were compared for isolators with EC = 2 and found to be in good agreement with each other with a maximum absolute percentage deviation of 11%.