Difficulties in being responsible institutional investors: evidence from Malaysia
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to ascertain whether institutional investors in Malaysia faced limitations when they are involved i n the corporate governance of their investee companies. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative approach, consisting of a series of interviews with...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/81954/1/81954_Difficulties%20in%20being%20responsible.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/81954/ https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SRJ-12-2017-0264/full/pdf?title=difficulties-in-being-responsible-institutional-investors-evidencefrom-malaysia |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
–
The purpose of this paper is to ascertain whether institutional investors in Malaysia
faced limitations when they are involved i
n the corporate governance of their investee
companies.
Design/methodology/approach
–
A qualitative approach, consisting of a series of interviews with
senior investment managers of different type of institutional investors, was chosen. In total, 18 interviews
were conducted over a period of two months, which is thought to sufficiently provide the answers to the
research purpose.
Findings
–
The interviews revealed there are difficulties in monitoring all investee companies due to lack
of time and resources. Traditional measures such as company financial performance and dividend
policy, continued to be favored and rigorously monitored. The overdependence on hard criteria may be a
result of a culture of overly rewarding beneficiaries and a lack of expertise in being involved in specialized
company areas such as strategy. Strict regulations hamper effort to be more involved in governing
investee companies.
Research limitations/implications
–
The research used interviews and generalization may become an
issue. In addition, access to many managers depended on recommendations, and the respondents are
selected to represent the different types of institutional investors.
Originality/value
–
Investigation into factors that may limit institutional investors’ involvement in
corporate governance in Malaysian public listed companies, especially from a more qualitative
viewpoint, is lacking. In addition, this paper advances the understanding of shareholder activism by
adding to the literature by exploring the issue in a specific emerging markets context. |
---|