Judicial activism and judicial restraint in the constitutional adjudication institution of Malaysia
Justices of Malaysian’s courts have the constitutional role of upholding the Federal Constitution, rule of law and safeguarding human rights. In dispensing justice, the judges have shown their creativity in dealing with cases of intrusion by the executive and legislature and their willingness to exp...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English English English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/78523/1/I%20October%20Symposium%201%20program.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/78523/4/Judicial%20Activism.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/78523/2/Law%20and%20Justice%20in%20Malaysia_%202020%20and%20Beyond%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Symposium.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/78523/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Democratic transition and constitutional justice: post Reformasi Constitutional Adjudication in Indonesia
by: Satriawan, Iwan, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Implications of the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court Justices Selection System on Judicial Independence: A Comparative Study between Indonesia and Malaysia
by: Shuaib, Farid Sufian
Published: (2020) -
Political crisis 2020 and how the Federal Constitution is being implemented
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin
Published: (2020) -
Indonesia constitutional court: the guardians of democracy in pandemic era
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Constitutional democracy and constitutional adjudication: a comparison of constitutional adjudication institutions in Malaysia and Indonesia
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, et al.
Published: (2016)