Performance evaluation of linear quadratic regulator and linear quadratic Gaussian controllers on quadrotor platform

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the performances of the three different controllers such as Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), 1-DOF (Degree of Freedom) Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) and 2-DOF LQG based on Quadrotor trajectory tracking and control effort. The basic algorithm of thes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Islam, Maidul, Okasha, Mohamed Elsayed Aly Abd Elaziz, Sulaeman, Erwin, Fatai, Sado, Legowo, Ari
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering & Sciences Publication 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/73129/7/73129%20Performance%20evaluation%20of%20linear%20quadratic.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/73129/8/73129%20Performance%20evaluation%20of%20linear%20quadratic%20SCOPUS.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/73129/
https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v7i6s/F02380376S19.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.73129
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.731292019-07-12T01:54:50Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/73129/ Performance evaluation of linear quadratic regulator and linear quadratic Gaussian controllers on quadrotor platform Islam, Maidul Okasha, Mohamed Elsayed Aly Abd Elaziz Sulaeman, Erwin Fatai, Sado Legowo, Ari TL500 Aeronautics The purpose of this article is to evaluate the performances of the three different controllers such as Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), 1-DOF (Degree of Freedom) Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) and 2-DOF LQG based on Quadrotor trajectory tracking and control effort. The basic algorithm of these three controllers are almost same but arrangement of some additional features, such as integral part and Kalman filter in the 1-DOF and 2-DOF LQG, make these two LQG controllers more robust comparing to LQR. Circular and Helical trajectories have been adopted in order to investigate the performances of the controllers in MATLAB/Simulink environment. Remarkably the 2-DOF LQG ensures its highly robust performance when system was considered under uncertainties. In order to investigate the tracking performance of the controllers, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) method is adopted. The 2-DOF LQG significantly ensures that the error is less than 5% RMSE and maintains stable control input continuously. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering & Sciences Publication 2019-03 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/73129/7/73129%20Performance%20evaluation%20of%20linear%20quadratic.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/73129/8/73129%20Performance%20evaluation%20of%20linear%20quadratic%20SCOPUS.pdf Islam, Maidul and Okasha, Mohamed Elsayed Aly Abd Elaziz and Sulaeman, Erwin and Fatai, Sado and Legowo, Ari (2019) Performance evaluation of linear quadratic regulator and linear quadratic Gaussian controllers on quadrotor platform. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 7 (6S). pp. 191-195. ISSN 2277-3878 https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v7i6s/F02380376S19.pdf
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
English
topic TL500 Aeronautics
spellingShingle TL500 Aeronautics
Islam, Maidul
Okasha, Mohamed Elsayed Aly Abd Elaziz
Sulaeman, Erwin
Fatai, Sado
Legowo, Ari
Performance evaluation of linear quadratic regulator and linear quadratic Gaussian controllers on quadrotor platform
description The purpose of this article is to evaluate the performances of the three different controllers such as Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), 1-DOF (Degree of Freedom) Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) and 2-DOF LQG based on Quadrotor trajectory tracking and control effort. The basic algorithm of these three controllers are almost same but arrangement of some additional features, such as integral part and Kalman filter in the 1-DOF and 2-DOF LQG, make these two LQG controllers more robust comparing to LQR. Circular and Helical trajectories have been adopted in order to investigate the performances of the controllers in MATLAB/Simulink environment. Remarkably the 2-DOF LQG ensures its highly robust performance when system was considered under uncertainties. In order to investigate the tracking performance of the controllers, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) method is adopted. The 2-DOF LQG significantly ensures that the error is less than 5% RMSE and maintains stable control input continuously.
format Article
author Islam, Maidul
Okasha, Mohamed Elsayed Aly Abd Elaziz
Sulaeman, Erwin
Fatai, Sado
Legowo, Ari
author_facet Islam, Maidul
Okasha, Mohamed Elsayed Aly Abd Elaziz
Sulaeman, Erwin
Fatai, Sado
Legowo, Ari
author_sort Islam, Maidul
title Performance evaluation of linear quadratic regulator and linear quadratic Gaussian controllers on quadrotor platform
title_short Performance evaluation of linear quadratic regulator and linear quadratic Gaussian controllers on quadrotor platform
title_full Performance evaluation of linear quadratic regulator and linear quadratic Gaussian controllers on quadrotor platform
title_fullStr Performance evaluation of linear quadratic regulator and linear quadratic Gaussian controllers on quadrotor platform
title_full_unstemmed Performance evaluation of linear quadratic regulator and linear quadratic Gaussian controllers on quadrotor platform
title_sort performance evaluation of linear quadratic regulator and linear quadratic gaussian controllers on quadrotor platform
publisher Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering & Sciences Publication
publishDate 2019
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/73129/7/73129%20Performance%20evaluation%20of%20linear%20quadratic.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/73129/8/73129%20Performance%20evaluation%20of%20linear%20quadratic%20SCOPUS.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/73129/
https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v7i6s/F02380376S19.pdf
_version_ 1643620276979630080
score 13.159267