Graphical vs. nongraphical displays: which one is the best labeling system for laboratory searching task?

Graphical displays are known to improve the process of obtaining information because it can be easily comprehended. It also can be recognized faster and more precisely compared to nongraphical (i.e. alphanumerical) displays. However, it is unknown if the graphical displays application in labeling sy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd Zamri, Muhamad Zul Asraf, Adnan, Ammar, Radin Umar, Radin Zaid, Samuel, Siby, Shaffiar, Norhashimah, Abdul Hamid, Abd. Malek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Human factors and Ergonomics Society Malaysia 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/70681/1/70681_Graphical%20vs.%20nongraphical%20displays.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/70681/
http://hfem.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/5_GRAPHICAL-VS.-NONGRAPHICAL-DISPLAYS-WHICH-ONE-IS-THE-BEST-LABELING-SYSTEM-FOR-LABORATORY-SEARCHING-TASK.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.70681
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.706812019-07-12T08:14:25Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/70681/ Graphical vs. nongraphical displays: which one is the best labeling system for laboratory searching task? Mohd Zamri, Muhamad Zul Asraf Adnan, Ammar Radin Umar, Radin Zaid Samuel, Siby Shaffiar, Norhashimah Abdul Hamid, Abd. Malek T Technology (General) T54 Industrial safety Graphical displays are known to improve the process of obtaining information because it can be easily comprehended. It also can be recognized faster and more precisely compared to nongraphical (i.e. alphanumerical) displays. However, it is unknown if the graphical displays application in labeling systems can improve the human performance in searching tasks in general, more particularly, on reducing the completion time of searching tasks and minimizing the errors made during the laboratory searching task. The objectives of the study are: (i) to evaluate the effect of graphical displays on the completion time of searching tasks; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of graphical displays on the errors made during searching tasks. Thirty-two participants (M= 21.875 years old; SD = 1.453) were recruited for the study, and assigned evenly to either the Graphical or the NonGraphical group. Participants were instructed to search for a total of sixteen items in a laboratory, and the completion time and errors made by him or her were recorded. The findings show that: (i) in term of completion time, there was a significant difference in the performance for Graphical group (M = 743.59, SD = 103.57) and NonGraphical group (M = 985.26, SD = 345.50) conditions; t (16) =2.680, p =0.015; and (ii) in term of the errors made, there was a significant difference in the performance for Graphical group (M = 0.19, SD = 0.544) and NonGraphical group (M = 1.13, SD = 1.360) conditions; t (16) =2.560, p =0.019. The results show that graphical displays is the best labeling system for laboratory searching task for both dependent variables being evaluated. The results from this study provide additional information regarding the application of graphical displays on human performance in general, and more specifically, recommend a better and suitable display type of labeling system – which is, one of the attributes of 5S system – for searching tasks. Human factors and Ergonomics Society Malaysia 2018-06 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/70681/1/70681_Graphical%20vs.%20nongraphical%20displays.pdf Mohd Zamri, Muhamad Zul Asraf and Adnan, Ammar and Radin Umar, Radin Zaid and Samuel, Siby and Shaffiar, Norhashimah and Abdul Hamid, Abd. Malek (2018) Graphical vs. nongraphical displays: which one is the best labeling system for laboratory searching task? Human Factors and Ergonomics Journal, 3 (1). pp. 26-33. http://hfem.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/5_GRAPHICAL-VS.-NONGRAPHICAL-DISPLAYS-WHICH-ONE-IS-THE-BEST-LABELING-SYSTEM-FOR-LABORATORY-SEARCHING-TASK.pdf
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic T Technology (General)
T54 Industrial safety
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
T54 Industrial safety
Mohd Zamri, Muhamad Zul Asraf
Adnan, Ammar
Radin Umar, Radin Zaid
Samuel, Siby
Shaffiar, Norhashimah
Abdul Hamid, Abd. Malek
Graphical vs. nongraphical displays: which one is the best labeling system for laboratory searching task?
description Graphical displays are known to improve the process of obtaining information because it can be easily comprehended. It also can be recognized faster and more precisely compared to nongraphical (i.e. alphanumerical) displays. However, it is unknown if the graphical displays application in labeling systems can improve the human performance in searching tasks in general, more particularly, on reducing the completion time of searching tasks and minimizing the errors made during the laboratory searching task. The objectives of the study are: (i) to evaluate the effect of graphical displays on the completion time of searching tasks; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of graphical displays on the errors made during searching tasks. Thirty-two participants (M= 21.875 years old; SD = 1.453) were recruited for the study, and assigned evenly to either the Graphical or the NonGraphical group. Participants were instructed to search for a total of sixteen items in a laboratory, and the completion time and errors made by him or her were recorded. The findings show that: (i) in term of completion time, there was a significant difference in the performance for Graphical group (M = 743.59, SD = 103.57) and NonGraphical group (M = 985.26, SD = 345.50) conditions; t (16) =2.680, p =0.015; and (ii) in term of the errors made, there was a significant difference in the performance for Graphical group (M = 0.19, SD = 0.544) and NonGraphical group (M = 1.13, SD = 1.360) conditions; t (16) =2.560, p =0.019. The results show that graphical displays is the best labeling system for laboratory searching task for both dependent variables being evaluated. The results from this study provide additional information regarding the application of graphical displays on human performance in general, and more specifically, recommend a better and suitable display type of labeling system – which is, one of the attributes of 5S system – for searching tasks.
format Article
author Mohd Zamri, Muhamad Zul Asraf
Adnan, Ammar
Radin Umar, Radin Zaid
Samuel, Siby
Shaffiar, Norhashimah
Abdul Hamid, Abd. Malek
author_facet Mohd Zamri, Muhamad Zul Asraf
Adnan, Ammar
Radin Umar, Radin Zaid
Samuel, Siby
Shaffiar, Norhashimah
Abdul Hamid, Abd. Malek
author_sort Mohd Zamri, Muhamad Zul Asraf
title Graphical vs. nongraphical displays: which one is the best labeling system for laboratory searching task?
title_short Graphical vs. nongraphical displays: which one is the best labeling system for laboratory searching task?
title_full Graphical vs. nongraphical displays: which one is the best labeling system for laboratory searching task?
title_fullStr Graphical vs. nongraphical displays: which one is the best labeling system for laboratory searching task?
title_full_unstemmed Graphical vs. nongraphical displays: which one is the best labeling system for laboratory searching task?
title_sort graphical vs. nongraphical displays: which one is the best labeling system for laboratory searching task?
publisher Human factors and Ergonomics Society Malaysia
publishDate 2018
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/70681/1/70681_Graphical%20vs.%20nongraphical%20displays.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/70681/
http://hfem.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/5_GRAPHICAL-VS.-NONGRAPHICAL-DISPLAYS-WHICH-ONE-IS-THE-BEST-LABELING-SYSTEM-FOR-LABORATORY-SEARCHING-TASK.pdf
_version_ 1643619930449379328
score 13.160551