Muslim jurists’ opinions on the permissibility of tissue engineering experimentation: analysis of selected examples

Scientific advancement in medical and health has helped us improve the understanding in the management of human health conditions. This may be one reason Muslim jurists acknowledge the importance of evidence-based practice and thus, in principle, agreed on the permissibility of scientific research...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad Radzi, Muhammad Aaʼzamuddin, Mohd. Azharuddin, Nur Syamimi, Hashi, Abdurezak Abdulahi, Noor Azmi, Azran Azhim, Sha'ban, Munirah
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: TERMIS 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/70472/1/70472_Muslim%20Jurists%E2%80%99%20Opinions%20on%20the%20Permissibility%20of%20Tissue_new.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/70472/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.70472
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.704722020-10-06T03:39:20Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/70472/ Muslim jurists’ opinions on the permissibility of tissue engineering experimentation: analysis of selected examples Ahmad Radzi, Muhammad Aaʼzamuddin Mohd. Azharuddin, Nur Syamimi Hashi, Abdurezak Abdulahi Noor Azmi, Azran Azhim Sha'ban, Munirah BJ1188 Religious ethics Scientific advancement in medical and health has helped us improve the understanding in the management of human health conditions. This may be one reason Muslim jurists acknowledge the importance of evidence-based practice and thus, in principle, agreed on the permissibility of scientific research. However, they have also raised some ethical and Islamic jurisprudence concerns about the methods and implications of some biomedical practices. Despite the great discovery of cartilage tissue engineering, harm and therapeutic uncertainties spark the ethical concerns surround the technology. The stakeholders have ever since been debating on its benefits and risks. The potential applications of cartilage tissue engineering are being unveiled with much hype and expectations among the scientists and the public at large. The demand for personalized engineered tissues may increase over the time. However, the progress of cartilage tissue engineering experimentation (CTEE) has been slow due to scientific and technical challenges which related to moral, religious and philosophical aspects. The concerns involve three main components in tissue engineering (correspond to CTEE) which are the cell sources, biomaterial scaffold and stimulating factors. The discussion also included the animal study in CTEE. With the development of modern biomedical technology, Muslim jurists and ethicists raised some ethical concerns about the morality and the permissibility of applications of the technology to human body. The study employed the qualitative approach using a secondary analysis of historical documents and available contemporary materials on CTEE with regards to Islamic approach. The opinions of Muslim scholars with regards to CTEE were revealed. TERMIS 2018-09 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/70472/1/70472_Muslim%20Jurists%E2%80%99%20Opinions%20on%20the%20Permissibility%20of%20Tissue_new.pdf Ahmad Radzi, Muhammad Aaʼzamuddin and Mohd. Azharuddin, Nur Syamimi and Hashi, Abdurezak Abdulahi and Noor Azmi, Azran Azhim and Sha'ban, Munirah (2018) Muslim jurists’ opinions on the permissibility of tissue engineering experimentation: analysis of selected examples. In: 2018 TERMIS World Congress, September 4-7 2018, Kyoto International Conference Center, Kyoto, Japan. (Unpublished)
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic BJ1188 Religious ethics
spellingShingle BJ1188 Religious ethics
Ahmad Radzi, Muhammad Aaʼzamuddin
Mohd. Azharuddin, Nur Syamimi
Hashi, Abdurezak Abdulahi
Noor Azmi, Azran Azhim
Sha'ban, Munirah
Muslim jurists’ opinions on the permissibility of tissue engineering experimentation: analysis of selected examples
description Scientific advancement in medical and health has helped us improve the understanding in the management of human health conditions. This may be one reason Muslim jurists acknowledge the importance of evidence-based practice and thus, in principle, agreed on the permissibility of scientific research. However, they have also raised some ethical and Islamic jurisprudence concerns about the methods and implications of some biomedical practices. Despite the great discovery of cartilage tissue engineering, harm and therapeutic uncertainties spark the ethical concerns surround the technology. The stakeholders have ever since been debating on its benefits and risks. The potential applications of cartilage tissue engineering are being unveiled with much hype and expectations among the scientists and the public at large. The demand for personalized engineered tissues may increase over the time. However, the progress of cartilage tissue engineering experimentation (CTEE) has been slow due to scientific and technical challenges which related to moral, religious and philosophical aspects. The concerns involve three main components in tissue engineering (correspond to CTEE) which are the cell sources, biomaterial scaffold and stimulating factors. The discussion also included the animal study in CTEE. With the development of modern biomedical technology, Muslim jurists and ethicists raised some ethical concerns about the morality and the permissibility of applications of the technology to human body. The study employed the qualitative approach using a secondary analysis of historical documents and available contemporary materials on CTEE with regards to Islamic approach. The opinions of Muslim scholars with regards to CTEE were revealed.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Ahmad Radzi, Muhammad Aaʼzamuddin
Mohd. Azharuddin, Nur Syamimi
Hashi, Abdurezak Abdulahi
Noor Azmi, Azran Azhim
Sha'ban, Munirah
author_facet Ahmad Radzi, Muhammad Aaʼzamuddin
Mohd. Azharuddin, Nur Syamimi
Hashi, Abdurezak Abdulahi
Noor Azmi, Azran Azhim
Sha'ban, Munirah
author_sort Ahmad Radzi, Muhammad Aaʼzamuddin
title Muslim jurists’ opinions on the permissibility of tissue engineering experimentation: analysis of selected examples
title_short Muslim jurists’ opinions on the permissibility of tissue engineering experimentation: analysis of selected examples
title_full Muslim jurists’ opinions on the permissibility of tissue engineering experimentation: analysis of selected examples
title_fullStr Muslim jurists’ opinions on the permissibility of tissue engineering experimentation: analysis of selected examples
title_full_unstemmed Muslim jurists’ opinions on the permissibility of tissue engineering experimentation: analysis of selected examples
title_sort muslim jurists’ opinions on the permissibility of tissue engineering experimentation: analysis of selected examples
publisher TERMIS
publishDate 2018
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/70472/1/70472_Muslim%20Jurists%E2%80%99%20Opinions%20on%20the%20Permissibility%20of%20Tissue_new.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/70472/
_version_ 1680320865191854080
score 13.211869