Different slaughtering techniques and possible physiological and biomolecular effects
The aim of the study was to identify possible physiological and biomolecular changes during slaughtering. For slaughtering, before the neck cutting, chickens are immobilized manually or immobilized using shackles. Neck cutting is generally performed using automated knife, often results in decapita...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Malaysian Society of Applied Biology
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/62265/12/62265_Different%20slaughtering%20techniques%20and%20possible%20physiological_complete.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/62265/7/62265_Different%C2%A0slaughtering%C2%A0techniques_scopus.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/62265/ http://mabjournal.com/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The aim of the study was to identify possible physiological and biomolecular changes during slaughtering. For slaughtering,
before the neck cutting, chickens are immobilized manually or immobilized using shackles. Neck cutting is generally performed
using automated knife, often results in decapitation. Both of these immobilization and neck cutting conditions are expected to
influence muscle contraction and blood loss. We have investigated the activity and transcription of acetylcholinesterase (AChE)
which terminates cholinergic synaptic transmission by hydrolysing the neurotransmitter acetylcholine that is responsible for
muscle contraction and relaxation. We have also analysed the residual haemoglobin content of the skeletal muscle as indicator
of blood loss. Skeletal muscle sample was collected from the chickens that were slaughtered either by decapitation (C) or by
severance of the jugular veins, carotid arteries, oesophagus and trachea only (P); whilst immediately after slaughtering, chickens
were either released (R) or manually constrained (T). Differences in the conditions of slaughtering: CR, PR or PT did not
affect blood loss as measured by the residual Hb content and the amount of Zn and Fe either in muscle or liver, deducing no
significant difference (p>0.05) in blood loss due to different type of slaughtering. No significant differences (p>0.05) were
observed in AChE activity in muscles taken from all slaughter groups. However, AChE transcripts were detected in muscles
from chickens from PT and CR groups which might be due to the decapitation and/or constrained muscular activity after
neck cutting. Hence the results of the current study indicate that, constraining during slaughtering and decapitation might
induce stress to the animals. |
|---|