Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty

According to Articles 74(1) and 83(1) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, the maritime boundary delimitation is to be affected by agreement in accordance with international law in order to achieve equitable solution. The rule is inherently vague, controversial and a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/2/49%20ACCEPTANCE%20GHAFUR.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/5/Maritime%20Boundary%20Delimitation%20Presentation%20%28ICDR%202017%29%20%28Prof.%20Ghafur%29%202.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/
https://icdr2017.org/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.59261
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.592612018-01-13T07:01:34Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/ Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein KZ Law of Nations According to Articles 74(1) and 83(1) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, the maritime boundary delimitation is to be affected by agreement in accordance with international law in order to achieve equitable solution. The rule is inherently vague, controversial and allows the courts unprecedented discretionary power to determine how an equitable solution could be achieved. This watered-down and compromised formula of the UNCLOS 1982 is due to lack of consensus among negotiating States at the time of drafting the convention. The present paper makes an analytical study of the decisions of the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea on this issue in order to examine whether a consistent maritime boundary delimitation approach has been established through the jurisprudence of the courts. The paper traces the evolving trend of judicial precedents from the equitable principles of the Norther Sea Continental Shelf cases to the two -stage approach initiated in Jan Mayen Case and followed in many other cases, to the three-stage approach of the Black Sea and the more recent cases of the Bay of Bengal and the Columbia-Nicaragua. The paper concludes that while over the past three decades a clearer approach to maritime delimitation has emerged through the decisions of the international courts, there are still subjectivity and uncertainty in the choice of basepoints prior to constructing the provisional delimitation line and in the context of the practical application of the established delimitation approach. 2017-08-10 Conference or Workshop Item REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/2/49%20ACCEPTANCE%20GHAFUR.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/5/Maritime%20Boundary%20Delimitation%20Presentation%20%28ICDR%202017%29%20%28Prof.%20Ghafur%29%202.pdf Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein (2017) Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty. In: International Conference on Dispute Resolution (ICDR) 2017, 9th-10th August 2017, Kuala Lumpur. (Unpublished) https://icdr2017.org/
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
English
topic KZ Law of Nations
spellingShingle KZ Law of Nations
Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein
Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
description According to Articles 74(1) and 83(1) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, the maritime boundary delimitation is to be affected by agreement in accordance with international law in order to achieve equitable solution. The rule is inherently vague, controversial and allows the courts unprecedented discretionary power to determine how an equitable solution could be achieved. This watered-down and compromised formula of the UNCLOS 1982 is due to lack of consensus among negotiating States at the time of drafting the convention. The present paper makes an analytical study of the decisions of the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea on this issue in order to examine whether a consistent maritime boundary delimitation approach has been established through the jurisprudence of the courts. The paper traces the evolving trend of judicial precedents from the equitable principles of the Norther Sea Continental Shelf cases to the two -stage approach initiated in Jan Mayen Case and followed in many other cases, to the three-stage approach of the Black Sea and the more recent cases of the Bay of Bengal and the Columbia-Nicaragua. The paper concludes that while over the past three decades a clearer approach to maritime delimitation has emerged through the decisions of the international courts, there are still subjectivity and uncertainty in the choice of basepoints prior to constructing the provisional delimitation line and in the context of the practical application of the established delimitation approach.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein
author_facet Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein
author_sort Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein
title Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
title_short Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
title_full Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
title_fullStr Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
title_full_unstemmed Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
title_sort refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
publishDate 2017
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/2/49%20ACCEPTANCE%20GHAFUR.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/5/Maritime%20Boundary%20Delimitation%20Presentation%20%28ICDR%202017%29%20%28Prof.%20Ghafur%29%202.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/
https://icdr2017.org/
_version_ 1643615546853294080
score 13.18916