Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study
The growth of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is an inevitable phenomenon due to inherent drawback of the conventional litigation. One of the most acceptable forms of ADR is ombudsman which is known as Muhtasibfrom Islamic perspective. In Malaysia, the first ombudsman institution has been es...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws (AIKOL), International Islamic University Malaysia
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/58747/2/58747.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/58747/ https://icdr2017.org/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.iium.irep.58747 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.iium.irep.587472017-10-12T02:15:32Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/58747/ Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana Hassan, Rusni Ibrahim, Uzaimah K Law (General) The growth of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is an inevitable phenomenon due to inherent drawback of the conventional litigation. One of the most acceptable forms of ADR is ombudsman which is known as Muhtasibfrom Islamic perspective. In Malaysia, the first ombudsman institution has been established in financial industry operated by the Ombudsman for Financial Services (OFS). It is one of the moves initiated by Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) with a view of providing simple, inexpensive and effective redress mechanism to financial consumers. Applying doctrinal research methodology, this paper examines the background of Muhtasib and ombudsman as well as their functions and characteristics. Similar observation is made vis-à-vis the OFS. These three aspects are subsequently compared to investigate the similarities and differences between the Muhtasib, ombudsman and the OFS. The study concludes that both the Muhtasib and ombudsman have undergone evolution from their original structure. Despite derived from different origin and with a different terminology used, it is resolved that in the contemporary milieu of alternative dispute resolution, the function of Muhtasib and ombudsman is ultimately to settle the dispute amicably, impartially, effectively and independently. The key principles of ombudsman are also in line with Shariah principles and have been incorporated in the establishment of the OFS. Recommendation is made concerning the imposition of specific requirements on the ombudsmen of the OFS. This study provides a significant insight on the traditional and modern aspect of Muhtasib and ombudsman as well as the newly set up Malaysian OFS. Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws (AIKOL), International Islamic University Malaysia 2017 Conference or Workshop Item REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/58747/2/58747.pdf Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana and Hassan, Rusni and Ibrahim, Uzaimah (2017) Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study. In: International Conference on Dispute Resolution 2017 - Modern Trends in Effective Dispute Resolution, 9th-10th August 2017, Kuala Lumpur. https://icdr2017.org/ |
institution |
Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
building |
IIUM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
content_source |
IIUM Repository (IREP) |
url_provider |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
K Law (General) |
spellingShingle |
K Law (General) Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana Hassan, Rusni Ibrahim, Uzaimah Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study |
description |
The growth of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is an inevitable phenomenon due to
inherent drawback of the conventional litigation. One of the most acceptable forms of
ADR is ombudsman which is known as Muhtasibfrom Islamic perspective. In Malaysia,
the first ombudsman institution has been established in financial industry operated by
the Ombudsman for Financial Services (OFS). It is one of the moves initiated by Bank
Negara Malaysia (BNM) with a view of providing simple, inexpensive and effective
redress mechanism to financial consumers. Applying doctrinal research methodology,
this paper examines the background of Muhtasib and ombudsman as well as their
functions and characteristics. Similar observation is made vis-à-vis the OFS. These
three aspects are subsequently compared to investigate the similarities and differences
between the Muhtasib, ombudsman and the OFS. The study concludes that both the
Muhtasib and ombudsman have undergone evolution from their original structure.
Despite derived from different origin and with a different terminology used, it is resolved
that in the contemporary milieu of alternative dispute resolution, the function of Muhtasib
and ombudsman is ultimately to settle the dispute amicably, impartially, effectively and
independently. The key principles of ombudsman are also in line with Shariah principles
and have been incorporated in the establishment of the OFS. Recommendation is made
concerning the imposition of specific requirements on the ombudsmen of the OFS. This
study provides a significant insight on the traditional and modern aspect of Muhtasib and
ombudsman as well as the newly set up Malaysian OFS. |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana Hassan, Rusni Ibrahim, Uzaimah |
author_facet |
Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana Hassan, Rusni Ibrahim, Uzaimah |
author_sort |
Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana |
title |
Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study |
title_short |
Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study |
title_full |
Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study |
title_fullStr |
Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study |
title_sort |
muhtasib, ombudsman and malaysian financial ombudsman scheme: a comparative study |
publisher |
Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws (AIKOL), International Islamic University Malaysia |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/58747/2/58747.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/58747/ https://icdr2017.org/ |
_version_ |
1643615427313532928 |
score |
13.211869 |