Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study

The growth of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is an inevitable phenomenon due to inherent drawback of the conventional litigation. One of the most acceptable forms of ADR is ombudsman which is known as Muhtasibfrom Islamic perspective. In Malaysia, the first ombudsman institution has been es...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana, Hassan, Rusni, Ibrahim, Uzaimah
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws (AIKOL), International Islamic University Malaysia 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/58747/2/58747.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/58747/
https://icdr2017.org/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.58747
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.587472017-10-12T02:15:32Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/58747/ Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana Hassan, Rusni Ibrahim, Uzaimah K Law (General) The growth of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is an inevitable phenomenon due to inherent drawback of the conventional litigation. One of the most acceptable forms of ADR is ombudsman which is known as Muhtasibfrom Islamic perspective. In Malaysia, the first ombudsman institution has been established in financial industry operated by the Ombudsman for Financial Services (OFS). It is one of the moves initiated by Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) with a view of providing simple, inexpensive and effective redress mechanism to financial consumers. Applying doctrinal research methodology, this paper examines the background of Muhtasib and ombudsman as well as their functions and characteristics. Similar observation is made vis-à-vis the OFS. These three aspects are subsequently compared to investigate the similarities and differences between the Muhtasib, ombudsman and the OFS. The study concludes that both the Muhtasib and ombudsman have undergone evolution from their original structure. Despite derived from different origin and with a different terminology used, it is resolved that in the contemporary milieu of alternative dispute resolution, the function of Muhtasib and ombudsman is ultimately to settle the dispute amicably, impartially, effectively and independently. The key principles of ombudsman are also in line with Shariah principles and have been incorporated in the establishment of the OFS. Recommendation is made concerning the imposition of specific requirements on the ombudsmen of the OFS. This study provides a significant insight on the traditional and modern aspect of Muhtasib and ombudsman as well as the newly set up Malaysian OFS. Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws (AIKOL), International Islamic University Malaysia 2017 Conference or Workshop Item REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/58747/2/58747.pdf Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana and Hassan, Rusni and Ibrahim, Uzaimah (2017) Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study. In: International Conference on Dispute Resolution 2017 - Modern Trends in Effective Dispute Resolution, 9th-10th August 2017, Kuala Lumpur. https://icdr2017.org/
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic K Law (General)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana
Hassan, Rusni
Ibrahim, Uzaimah
Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study
description The growth of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is an inevitable phenomenon due to inherent drawback of the conventional litigation. One of the most acceptable forms of ADR is ombudsman which is known as Muhtasibfrom Islamic perspective. In Malaysia, the first ombudsman institution has been established in financial industry operated by the Ombudsman for Financial Services (OFS). It is one of the moves initiated by Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) with a view of providing simple, inexpensive and effective redress mechanism to financial consumers. Applying doctrinal research methodology, this paper examines the background of Muhtasib and ombudsman as well as their functions and characteristics. Similar observation is made vis-à-vis the OFS. These three aspects are subsequently compared to investigate the similarities and differences between the Muhtasib, ombudsman and the OFS. The study concludes that both the Muhtasib and ombudsman have undergone evolution from their original structure. Despite derived from different origin and with a different terminology used, it is resolved that in the contemporary milieu of alternative dispute resolution, the function of Muhtasib and ombudsman is ultimately to settle the dispute amicably, impartially, effectively and independently. The key principles of ombudsman are also in line with Shariah principles and have been incorporated in the establishment of the OFS. Recommendation is made concerning the imposition of specific requirements on the ombudsmen of the OFS. This study provides a significant insight on the traditional and modern aspect of Muhtasib and ombudsman as well as the newly set up Malaysian OFS.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana
Hassan, Rusni
Ibrahim, Uzaimah
author_facet Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana
Hassan, Rusni
Ibrahim, Uzaimah
author_sort Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana
title Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study
title_short Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study
title_full Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study
title_fullStr Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Muhtasib, Ombudsman and Malaysian financial Ombudsman scheme: A comparative study
title_sort muhtasib, ombudsman and malaysian financial ombudsman scheme: a comparative study
publisher Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws (AIKOL), International Islamic University Malaysia
publishDate 2017
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/58747/2/58747.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/58747/
https://icdr2017.org/
_version_ 1643615427313532928
score 13.211869