Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment

It is not about the tools, it’s using the tools to facilitate learning. This research explores the nature of the outcomes experienced by students for using audience response system technology in the classroom. Specifically, this study answers the question “What are the impacts of ARS on performance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan, Abdullah, Lili Marziana, Montadzah Ambag, Abdulgani
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/1/41462.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/4/41462_audience_response_scopus.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7020639
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.41462
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.414622018-05-24T05:40:54Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/ Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan Abdullah, Lili Marziana Montadzah Ambag, Abdulgani T Technology (General) It is not about the tools, it’s using the tools to facilitate learning. This research explores the nature of the outcomes experienced by students for using audience response system technology in the classroom. Specifically, this study answers the question “What are the impacts of ARS on performance outcomes in secondary level education?” A personally administer questionnaire and quasi-experimental method was used. Kirkpatrick’s four-level model was used to measure the performance outcome of the student in computer studies class at Adni International Islamic School. The finding shows that, student reaction outcome was positive. Student learning outcome improved but student behavior slightly changes due to the utilization of ARS. The post-test result outcome shows that there is no significant difference between students who received instruction through the audience response system and students who received instruction through non-technology based methods. 2014-11-17 Conference or Workshop Item REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/1/41462.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/4/41462_audience_response_scopus.pdf Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan and Abdullah, Lili Marziana and Montadzah Ambag, Abdulgani (2014) Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment. In: 5th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M), 17th - 19th November 2014, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7020639
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
English
topic T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan
Abdullah, Lili Marziana
Montadzah Ambag, Abdulgani
Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment
description It is not about the tools, it’s using the tools to facilitate learning. This research explores the nature of the outcomes experienced by students for using audience response system technology in the classroom. Specifically, this study answers the question “What are the impacts of ARS on performance outcomes in secondary level education?” A personally administer questionnaire and quasi-experimental method was used. Kirkpatrick’s four-level model was used to measure the performance outcome of the student in computer studies class at Adni International Islamic School. The finding shows that, student reaction outcome was positive. Student learning outcome improved but student behavior slightly changes due to the utilization of ARS. The post-test result outcome shows that there is no significant difference between students who received instruction through the audience response system and students who received instruction through non-technology based methods.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan
Abdullah, Lili Marziana
Montadzah Ambag, Abdulgani
author_facet Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan
Abdullah, Lili Marziana
Montadzah Ambag, Abdulgani
author_sort Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan
title Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment
title_short Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment
title_full Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment
title_fullStr Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment
title_full_unstemmed Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment
title_sort audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment
publishDate 2014
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/1/41462.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/4/41462_audience_response_scopus.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7020639
_version_ 1643612027066777600
score 13.18916