Competition law and the SMEs: does the Competition Act 2010 promote or hinder the development of the SMEs in Malaysia?
The role of competition law is to protect the process of competition among firm in the market by prohibiting anti-competitive behaviours such as Cartel and abuse of dominant position. It provides a level playing field between firms to compete openly in the market. However, it is often argued that...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Kuala Lumpur, International Business, Economics and Law Conference
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/34755/1/DR-NASARUDINASSOC-PROF-DR-ZUHAIRAH-DR-HALYANI-COMPETITION-LAW-AND-THE-SMES-DOES-THE-COMPETITION-ACT-2010-PROMOTE-OR-HINDER-THE-DEVELOPMENT-OF-THE-SMES.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/34755/ http://klibel.com/journal-publications/seajbel-vol-2-issue-3/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The role of competition law is to protect the process of competition among firm in the market by prohibiting anti-competitive
behaviours such as Cartel and abuse of dominant position. It provides a level playing field between firms to compete openly in
the market. However, it is often argued that by promoting open competition, competition law gives large firms with large capital
and resources and more advance technology a competitive advantage vis-à-vis small and medium firms. This forces the smaller
firms out of the market due to the inability to compete with the larger competitors. This paper will analyze the legal provisions
regulating competition in the market by virtue of the Competition Act 2010. This paper will then analyze to what extent the law
promotes the interest of small and medium firms. This paper argues that the competition law protects rather than hinders the
development of SMEs in Malaysia. For example, the provisions on dominant position and abuse thereof give the power to the
competition commission to prevent large firms from taking advantage of their market power to the detriment of consumers and
smaller firms. However, competition law should not be used to protect inefficient and weak competitors and should not punish
larger firms just because they are more efficient than the smaller firms. The law only controls the conducts that affect the process
of competition and the smaller firms may benefit naturally from this protection. |
|---|