"Al-Urof" implementations in section one at the Omani civil law: a comparative study with the Egyptian and the Jordanian civil laws = إعمال العرف في الكتاب األول من قانون المعامالت المدنية العماني االلتزامات والحقوق الشخصية: دراسة مقارنة بالقانون المدني المصري والقانون المدني األردني
This study aimed to discuss: the implementation of custom in the introductory chapter, and the first book of the Omani Civil Transactions Law, personal obligations and rights, and its comparison with the Egyptian civil law and the Jordanian civil law. The study adopted two approaches: the inductiv...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Arabic |
Published: |
OCERINT International Organization Center of Academic Research
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/113764/7/113764_%20Al-Urof%20implementations%20in%20section.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/113764/ http://ijasos.ocerintjournals.org/en/pub/issue/79764 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This study aimed to discuss: the implementation of custom in the introductory chapter, and the first book of
the Omani Civil Transactions Law, personal obligations and rights, and its comparison with the Egyptian civil
law and the Jordanian civil law. The study adopted two approaches: the inductive approach and the
descriptive analytical approach. The study concluded many results, perhaps foremost among them: The
Omani and Jordanian legislators agreed; If there is no text, the court rules in accordance with the provisions
of Islamic jurisprudence, and if it does not exist, then according to the general principles of Islamic law, and if
it does not exist, then according to custom. As for the Egyptian legislator, he presented the custom over the
provisions of Islamic law. The three laws agreed on: Considering custom as a measure of abuse in the use
of the right, as well as implementing custom in deciding on the finality of the contract with regard to the
payment of the down payment. The Omani legislator agreed with the Jordanian legislator, if the contracting
parties did not agree to specify the period, the judge may specify it according to custom, while the Egyptian
legislator neglected to regulate the option of the condition. The Omani legislator agrees with the Jordanian
legislator in implementing custom in the implementation of the contract. The Egyptian legislator agreed with
them in determining the requirements of the contract, but he also dealt with what is among its requirements
in accordance with the law, custom and justice according to the nature of the disposition. The first Omani
and Jordanian legislator; The attribution of custom in determining what conditions are attached to contracts. |
---|