An empirical assessment of business cycle asymmetries: evidence from Malaysia

Asymmetry is a key feature to understand the different behavior of expansions and recessions, and it provides a stylized fact that business cycle models should help to explain. Furthermore, the types of asymmetries provide guidance about underlying economic mechanism. In this paper, we test for thre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdul Manap, Turkhan Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Malaysia Sarawak 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/11128/1/Cycle_asymmetries.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/11128/
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=f0eedf19-4543-4dfd-bb1a-7e817a25eca7%40sessionmgr111&vid=4&hid=104
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.11128
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.111282011-12-21T11:08:21Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/11128/ An empirical assessment of business cycle asymmetries: evidence from Malaysia Abdul Manap, Turkhan Ali H Social Sciences (General) HB131 Methodology.Mathematical economics. Quantitative methods HB3711 Business cycles. Economic fluctuations Asymmetry is a key feature to understand the different behavior of expansions and recessions, and it provides a stylized fact that business cycle models should help to explain. Furthermore, the types of asymmetries provide guidance about underlying economic mechanism. In this paper, we test for three types of asymmetry of business cycle: steepness, deepness and sharpness, by using the parametric tests of Clements and Krolzig (2003), based on Markov-Switching autoregressive models in the real GDP of Malaysia for the period from 1975Q1 to 2006Q4. This paper also uses three different approaches to remove trend component of GDP to investigate the sensitivity of the findings of asymmetries to the method of trend eliminations. Finally, for comparison, the non-parametric test of Randles et al. (1980) is also employed. We find strong evidence of steep asymmetry but not deep sharp asymmetry for Malaysia which is in contrast to the findings of Khong and Lau (2007) and Eng and Wang (2008). These findings have important implications for econometric modeling and policy making. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak 2010-07 Article REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/11128/1/Cycle_asymmetries.pdf Abdul Manap, Turkhan Ali (2010) An empirical assessment of business cycle asymmetries: evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Society, 11 (1). pp. 33-50. ISSN 1511-6670 http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=f0eedf19-4543-4dfd-bb1a-7e817a25eca7%40sessionmgr111&vid=4&hid=104
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic H Social Sciences (General)
HB131 Methodology.Mathematical economics. Quantitative methods
HB3711 Business cycles. Economic fluctuations
spellingShingle H Social Sciences (General)
HB131 Methodology.Mathematical economics. Quantitative methods
HB3711 Business cycles. Economic fluctuations
Abdul Manap, Turkhan Ali
An empirical assessment of business cycle asymmetries: evidence from Malaysia
description Asymmetry is a key feature to understand the different behavior of expansions and recessions, and it provides a stylized fact that business cycle models should help to explain. Furthermore, the types of asymmetries provide guidance about underlying economic mechanism. In this paper, we test for three types of asymmetry of business cycle: steepness, deepness and sharpness, by using the parametric tests of Clements and Krolzig (2003), based on Markov-Switching autoregressive models in the real GDP of Malaysia for the period from 1975Q1 to 2006Q4. This paper also uses three different approaches to remove trend component of GDP to investigate the sensitivity of the findings of asymmetries to the method of trend eliminations. Finally, for comparison, the non-parametric test of Randles et al. (1980) is also employed. We find strong evidence of steep asymmetry but not deep sharp asymmetry for Malaysia which is in contrast to the findings of Khong and Lau (2007) and Eng and Wang (2008). These findings have important implications for econometric modeling and policy making.
format Article
author Abdul Manap, Turkhan Ali
author_facet Abdul Manap, Turkhan Ali
author_sort Abdul Manap, Turkhan Ali
title An empirical assessment of business cycle asymmetries: evidence from Malaysia
title_short An empirical assessment of business cycle asymmetries: evidence from Malaysia
title_full An empirical assessment of business cycle asymmetries: evidence from Malaysia
title_fullStr An empirical assessment of business cycle asymmetries: evidence from Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed An empirical assessment of business cycle asymmetries: evidence from Malaysia
title_sort empirical assessment of business cycle asymmetries: evidence from malaysia
publisher Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
publishDate 2010
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/11128/1/Cycle_asymmetries.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/11128/
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=f0eedf19-4543-4dfd-bb1a-7e817a25eca7%40sessionmgr111&vid=4&hid=104
_version_ 1643606459609513984
score 13.160551