Age differences in hedonic adaptation to societal restrictions? Positive and negative affect trajectories during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in 33 nations

We examined age group differences in hedonic adaptation trajectories of positive and negative affect (PA/NA) at different arousal levels during the severe societal restrictions that governments implemented to contain the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (March to June 2020). Data from 10,509 part...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reitsema, Anne Margit, Jeronimus, Bertus F, Hos, Elisabeth H, Collaboration, PsyCorona, Abdul Khaiyom, Jamilah Hanum, de Jonge, Peter, Leander, N Pontus
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: American Psychological Association 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/110328/7/110328_Age%20differences%20in%20hedonic%20adaptation.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/110328/13/110328_Age%20differences%20in%20hedonic%20adaptation%20to%20societal%20restrictions%20Positive%20and%20negative%20affect%20trajectories%20during%20the%20first%20wave%20of%20the%20Covid-19%20pandemic%20in%2033%20nations_Scopus.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/110328/
https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Femo0001149
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/emo0001149
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We examined age group differences in hedonic adaptation trajectories of positive and negative affect (PA/NA) at different arousal levels during the severe societal restrictions that governments implemented to contain the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (March to June 2020). Data from 10,509 participants from 33 countries and 12 weekly assessments were used (67% women, aged 18 to 85þ, on average 318 participants per country (SD = 434) and 5.6 assessments (SD = 2.5) per participant). Multilevel models (level 1: assessments, level 2:participants, level 3:countries) were fit to examine trajectories of low to high arousal PA and NA during the phase of tightening societal restrictions, the phase of stable peak restrictions, and the phase of easing restrictions separately. During the entire study period mean levels of PA were lower in emerging and young adults (aged 18–44) than older adults, whereas mean NA levels were higher. During peak societal restrictions, participants reported increasingly more PA, especially high-arousal emotions (d = .36 per month vs. .19 unaroused). NA levels decreased overtime, especially high-arousal emotions (d = .35 vs. .14p/month). These hedonic adaptation trajectories were largely similar across age groups. Nevertheless, up to 30% of the participants increased in NA and up to 6% decreased in PA, against the general trend, demonstrating substantial individual differences in emotional adaptation. Finally, heterogeneity in the effects of time on affect was larger on the individual level than the country level. Emotional recovery trajectories during the first lockdown in theCOVID-19 pandemic were virtually similar across age groups in 33 countries, across valence and arousal levels, suggesting age advantages in emotional well- being remain restricted to mean-level differences rather than emotion dynamics.