Contour maps of normalised scattered radiation doses at different eye heights and positions in an angiography room based on multiple linear regression model

• Main Authors: Ahmad Radzi, Halimatussa'Diah, Sohaimi, Norhanna, Md Ralib @ Md Raghib, Ahmad Razali
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Institute for Health Management (IHM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia (MOH) 2023
• Subjects: Q Science (General); R Medicine (General)
• Online Access: http://irep.iium.edu.my/110313/7/110313_Contour%20maps%20of%20normalised%20scattered%20radiation%20doses.pdf; http://irep.iium.edu.my/110313/; https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/johm/article/view/25218/13902

Background: The phantom study produced contour maps to educate angiography staff on the distributions of scattered radiation to their eyes. Methodology: The scattered radiation came from an upper-body PBU-31 phantom (Kyoto Kagaku) exposed to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage technical factors. A total of 48 nanoDots™ (Landauer Inc.) were placed on the paper tubes, corresponding to six positions and eight heights (from 135 cm to 170 cm, with 5 cm increments) of the angiography staff’s eyes from the scattered source. The studied projection and positions were posteroanterior (PA), 25° right anterior oblique (RAO), and 25° left anterior oblique (LAO). The measured doses (mGy) were normalised to the respective dose area product for each exposure (mGym2). The normalised doses (mGy/mGym2) were then transformed to their common logarithmic (log10) form and analysed using a multiple linear regression model. After the analysis, the back transformation was performed, and the contour maps of the results were produced. Results: Linear relationships were observed between log10 normalised scattered radiation doses with eye heights and positions for all projections [F (6,137) = 56.96, p< .001 (PA), F (6,137) = 299.94, p< .001 (25° RAO), F (6,137) = 333.953, p< .001 (25° LAO)]. An increase of 5 cm heights reduced normalised doses by 15.9%, 16.8%, and 6.7% in PA, 25° RAO, and 25° LAO, respectively. In PA projection, 155 cm and above eye heights received lower scattered radiation doses for all positions. Meanwhile, in 25° RAO, the flat panel detector (FD) shielded the position right next to the irradiated area. However, this position received higher scattered radiation doses in 25° LAO. Conclusion: The contour maps differed for each projection, and the distribution of scattered radiation in an angiography room was affected by the shielding of the FD. Manuscript classification: Original research