A ‘Blue Ocean’ for marginalised radical voices: cyberspace, social media and extremist discourse in Malaysia

• Main Author: Muhammad Uthman El-Muhammady, Ahmad El-Muhammady
• Format: Book Chapter
• Language: English; English
• Published: Palgrave Macmillan 2023
• Subjects: H Social Sciences (General); H61.8 Communication of information; JA Political science (General); PR English literature
• Online Access: http://irep.iium.edu.my/103719/1/103719_A%20%E2%80%98Blue%20Ocean%E2%80%99%20for%20marginalised%20radical%20voices.pdf; http://irep.iium.edu.my/103719/7/103719_%20A%20%E2%80%98Blue%20Ocean%E2%80%99%20for%20Marginalised%20Radical%20Voices_%20Cyberspace%2C%20Social%20Media%20and%20Extremist%20Discourse%20in%20Malaysia_SCOPUS.pdf; http://irep.iium.edu.my/103719/; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-19-7141-9_8

This article explores how cyberspace and social media are being used as instruments for the growth of extremist discourse in Malaysia—83% of militant detainees charged under anti-terrorism laws relied on social media platforms to access materials and establish virtual networking with likeminded individuals. The internet also provides a conducive environment for the incubation and growth of extremist discourse, where cyberspace and social media serve as vehicles of propaganda and recruitment—these have been major foci of research by academia and law enforcement alike. This article explores the issue from three angles: (1) the interplay between radicalisation and extremist discourse, particularly violent extremism; (2) the linkages between social media and cyberspace with democracy and postmodern discourse; and (3) the online manifestation of violent extremist groups, thus highlighting three growing threats based on religious, political and health-oriented radicalisation. This article suggests that three factors contribute to the growth of such extremist discourse and “marginalised voices”: (1) a democratic setting and postmodern discourse offer a conducive ecosystem and environment; (2) the use of “democratic rights” narratives to promote extremist discourse, particularly on certain platforms; and (3) the use of extremist discourse as counterpoint and alternative to dominant discourse and culture in mainstream media.