Comparison between Different Ways Used for Condensate Recovery from Natural Gas Field.
The recovery of condensate from natural gas needs some methods Joule-Thomason, Turbo-Expander and 38 Technology technique was considered a lot in this project. initial gas composition, temperature and pressure were used for steady state simulation of the condensate recovery process under engineer...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Final Year Project |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
2010
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://utpedia.utp.edu.my/10062/1/2010%20-%20Comparison%20Between%20Different%20Ways%20Used%20for%20Condensate%20Recovery%20from%20Natural%20Gas%20Field.pdf http://utpedia.utp.edu.my/10062/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The recovery of condensate from natural gas needs some methods Joule-Thomason,
Turbo-Expander and 38 Technology technique was considered a lot in this project.
initial gas composition, temperature and pressure were used for steady state
simulation of the condensate recovery process under engineering tool Hysys .Hysys
made all the analysis by using the provided input data and some necessary
assumptions and simulation output were used to compare Joule-Thomson valve and
Turbo-Expander and 38 Technology recently discover technically and
thennodynamically. .Hysys helped to estimate the cooling and advantages and
disadvantages of Joul-Thomson and Turbo-Expander .on the basis of the above
simulation, we can choose the suitable technology for condensate recovery method
from the small to medium to large scale range of pressure and temperature condition,
technically and thennodynamically efficient ,easy to operate, can minimize the cost . |
|---|