Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Stingless Bee Propolis from Different Extraction Methods

Propolis has been used as therapeutic agent since ancient time and considered as high value materials. In order to obtain maximum yield of extract production with excellent biological activity, extraction techniques need to be established. This study aimed to optimize extraction protocol and screen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khamsah Suryati, Mohd, Nur Basyirah, Md Zin, Azierah, Azemin, Muhammad Muslim, Mohd Rodi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5815/1/FH02-FBIM-19-24104.pdf
http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5815/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-unisza-ir.5815
record_format eprints
spelling my-unisza-ir.58152022-02-27T02:59:09Z http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5815/ Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Stingless Bee Propolis from Different Extraction Methods Khamsah Suryati, Mohd Nur Basyirah, Md Zin Azierah, Azemin Muhammad Muslim, Mohd Rodi SF Animal culture Propolis has been used as therapeutic agent since ancient time and considered as high value materials. In order to obtain maximum yield of extract production with excellent biological activity, extraction techniques need to be established. This study aimed to optimize extraction protocol and screen total phenolic, total flavonoid and antioxidant activity. Propolis was collected from Apiary of UniSZA, Besut Campus. Propolis was extracted with 70% and 95% ethanol using different extraction methods, which were: maceration, sonication and soxhlet. Total phenolic content and flavonoid content were determined using spectrophotometric method. The antioxidant activity was evaluated using 2, 2- diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH assay). Extraction by maceration at 5 days of ethanolic extract showed the highest total phenolic content of 46.68±2.08 mg gallic acid equivalents per g extract propolis (GAE/g). While, 70% ethanolic from 30 minutes of sonication method displayed the highest total flavonoid content compare to that 95% ethanol with value 107.27±4.10 mg quercetin equivalents per g extract (QE/g). The lowest total flavonoid content was 95% ethanolic extract by soxhlet extraction at 6 hours (26.71±3.58QE/g). The propolis extract of 70% ethanol from sonication (30 minutes) also showed a good antioxidant activity with IC50 value 11±0.55μg/mL Trolox equivalents per g extract. Finding from this study showed the most specification of extraction methods is important to extract specific compounds and quality extract for propolis. 2018-12 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5815/1/FH02-FBIM-19-24104.pdf Khamsah Suryati, Mohd and Nur Basyirah, Md Zin and Azierah, Azemin and Muhammad Muslim, Mohd Rodi (2018) Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Stingless Bee Propolis from Different Extraction Methods. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (4). pp. 90-95. ISSN 2227-524X
institution Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
building UNISZA Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
content_source UNISZA Institutional Repository
url_provider https://eprints.unisza.edu.my/
language English
topic SF Animal culture
spellingShingle SF Animal culture
Khamsah Suryati, Mohd
Nur Basyirah, Md Zin
Azierah, Azemin
Muhammad Muslim, Mohd Rodi
Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Stingless Bee Propolis from Different Extraction Methods
description Propolis has been used as therapeutic agent since ancient time and considered as high value materials. In order to obtain maximum yield of extract production with excellent biological activity, extraction techniques need to be established. This study aimed to optimize extraction protocol and screen total phenolic, total flavonoid and antioxidant activity. Propolis was collected from Apiary of UniSZA, Besut Campus. Propolis was extracted with 70% and 95% ethanol using different extraction methods, which were: maceration, sonication and soxhlet. Total phenolic content and flavonoid content were determined using spectrophotometric method. The antioxidant activity was evaluated using 2, 2- diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH assay). Extraction by maceration at 5 days of ethanolic extract showed the highest total phenolic content of 46.68±2.08 mg gallic acid equivalents per g extract propolis (GAE/g). While, 70% ethanolic from 30 minutes of sonication method displayed the highest total flavonoid content compare to that 95% ethanol with value 107.27±4.10 mg quercetin equivalents per g extract (QE/g). The lowest total flavonoid content was 95% ethanolic extract by soxhlet extraction at 6 hours (26.71±3.58QE/g). The propolis extract of 70% ethanol from sonication (30 minutes) also showed a good antioxidant activity with IC50 value 11±0.55μg/mL Trolox equivalents per g extract. Finding from this study showed the most specification of extraction methods is important to extract specific compounds and quality extract for propolis.
format Article
author Khamsah Suryati, Mohd
Nur Basyirah, Md Zin
Azierah, Azemin
Muhammad Muslim, Mohd Rodi
author_facet Khamsah Suryati, Mohd
Nur Basyirah, Md Zin
Azierah, Azemin
Muhammad Muslim, Mohd Rodi
author_sort Khamsah Suryati, Mohd
title Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Stingless Bee Propolis from Different Extraction Methods
title_short Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Stingless Bee Propolis from Different Extraction Methods
title_full Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Stingless Bee Propolis from Different Extraction Methods
title_fullStr Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Stingless Bee Propolis from Different Extraction Methods
title_full_unstemmed Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Stingless Bee Propolis from Different Extraction Methods
title_sort chemical composition and antioxidant activity of stingless bee propolis from different extraction methods
publishDate 2018
url http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5815/1/FH02-FBIM-19-24104.pdf
http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/5815/
_version_ 1725976997455200256
score 13.188404