The effect of photomultiplier tube glass entrance window on plastic scintillator case sheet photon dosimetry: a monte carlo study
Plastic scintillators are commonly used for medical dosimetry due to the density and effective atomic numbers that are closer to human soft tissue. When a photomultiplier tube (PMT) is used with a thin scintillator, reflected photon and electrons as a result of Compton scattering either inside th...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English English English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/2484/1/FH03-FSK-19-31516.jpg http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/2484/2/FH03-FSK-19-31517.jpg http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/2484/3/FH03-FSK-19-31519.pdf http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/2484/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Plastic scintillators are commonly used for medical dosimetry due to the density
and effective atomic numbers that are closer to human soft tissue. When a photomultiplier tube
(PMT) is used with a thin scintillator, reflected photon and electrons as a result of Compton
scattering either inside the scintillator or PMT entrance window, might contribute to a
significant source of additional absorbed dose. Monte Carlo simulation was used to study the
effect of different PMT window materials on the absorbed dose of a 0.5 mm plastic scintillator
cast sheet for parallel photon beam energy up to 1 MeV. The additional dose in the plastic
scintillator from 400 keV to 1 MeV due to sapphire and LiF glass are increases from 11 % to
47 % and 8 % to 31 %, respectively. Despite of the lower density of Quartz among other
materials, Quartz and MgF2 demonstrate almost similar trends of additional dose throughout the
energies, which is closer to the sapphire. This may due to relatively low effective atomic
number and density of LiF, and hence producing less reflected dose. To reduce the unexpected
additional dose, a plastic scintillator with a considerable thickness of a PMT window should be
adopted for the ‘soft-tissue’ dose response. |
---|