The legal protection of the Tasik Chini biosphere reserve: Criminalisation of environmental harms
The understanding of the environmental law has evolved significantly in recent times, and it provides the means of punishment or deterrent through criminalisation, policing and prosecution. Environmental crime can be defined as the perpetration of harm against the ecosystem and its inhabitants t...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/1258/1/FH03-FUHA-19-24141.pdf http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/1258/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The understanding of the environmental law has evolved
significantly in recent times, and it provides the means of
punishment or deterrent through criminalisation, policing and
prosecution. Environmental crime can be defined as the
perpetration of harm against the ecosystem and its inhabitants that
violate the law. This is of high importance in protected areas such
as the UNESCO Biosphere Reserves that focuses on the
synergistic relationship between man and environment. This paper
looks into the issue of environmental protection of the Tasik Chini
Biosphere Reserve located in the rural area of the State of Pahang,
Malaysia.
The biosphere reserve status is up to review by UNESCO in 2019
and the alarming state of the lake ecosystem due to unabated
anthropogenic interferences give rise to the risk of the area
of losing its international recognition. Thus the need to look into the
extent of legislative protection of the area through the
environmental crime perspective. In the first section of the paper,
the author describes the environmental harm that is afflicting the
area based on the activities of logging, mining and agriculture.
Next, the author reviews the corpus of legislation which is currently
enforced in Malaysia. Although the study finds that there is no
specific legislation dedicated to the biosphere reserve, there does
exist relevant applicable laws which are sufficient for the purpose
of criminalisation of environmental harm. This paper aims to
explore the gaps and how the area can be better policed and
managed against environmental crime. |
---|