Matching teaching styles and learning styles: what happens in the case of a mismatch?

It has been acknowledged that teacher and student diversity in the classroom have led to varied teaching and learning styles preferences. Previous studies have generally looked at teaching styles or learning styles in isolation and have rarely considered the impact of teaching styles on learning sty...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee, Mei Ph’ng, Thang, Siew Ming, Radha M. K. Nambiar,
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Journal of Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2015
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9350/1/066-076_Teaching_Style_Learning-Mei.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9350/
http://www.ukm.my/e-bangi/index.php?option=com_jresearch&view=publicationslist&Itemid=45&lang=en
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.9350
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.93502016-12-14T06:49:39Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9350/ Matching teaching styles and learning styles: what happens in the case of a mismatch? Lee, Mei Ph’ng Thang, Siew Ming Radha M. K. Nambiar, It has been acknowledged that teacher and student diversity in the classroom have led to varied teaching and learning styles preferences. Previous studies have generally looked at teaching styles or learning styles in isolation and have rarely considered the impact of teaching styles on learning styles or vice versa. This study extends this one step further by first establishing the learning styles of a group of engineering students and then investigating the impact of the teaching styles of their Technical Communication teacher on them in an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) context. Specifically it explores whether accommodation or resistance arises when there is a mismatch in teaching and learning styles. The respondents were 5 Malaysian engineering undergraduates from two engineering faculties of a public university. Data from students were collected using Felder and Silverman’s Index of Learning Styles (ILS) questionnaire, student interviews and reflective journals. Teaching styles of the teacher were identified using Grasha and Reichmann’s Teaching Style Survey. The findings revealed that the students and the teacher have mixed learning styles and teaching styles preferences respectively. In addition, the teachers’ teaching styles generally have a positive impact on the students but there were occasions when these were not so. These findings will be discussed in greater detail in this paper. Journal of Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2015 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9350/1/066-076_Teaching_Style_Learning-Mei.pdf Lee, Mei Ph’ng and Thang, Siew Ming and Radha M. K. Nambiar, (2015) Matching teaching styles and learning styles: what happens in the case of a mismatch? e-BANGI: Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Specia (1). pp. 66-76. ISSN 1823-884x http://www.ukm.my/e-bangi/index.php?option=com_jresearch&view=publicationslist&Itemid=45&lang=en
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Perpustakaan Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description It has been acknowledged that teacher and student diversity in the classroom have led to varied teaching and learning styles preferences. Previous studies have generally looked at teaching styles or learning styles in isolation and have rarely considered the impact of teaching styles on learning styles or vice versa. This study extends this one step further by first establishing the learning styles of a group of engineering students and then investigating the impact of the teaching styles of their Technical Communication teacher on them in an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) context. Specifically it explores whether accommodation or resistance arises when there is a mismatch in teaching and learning styles. The respondents were 5 Malaysian engineering undergraduates from two engineering faculties of a public university. Data from students were collected using Felder and Silverman’s Index of Learning Styles (ILS) questionnaire, student interviews and reflective journals. Teaching styles of the teacher were identified using Grasha and Reichmann’s Teaching Style Survey. The findings revealed that the students and the teacher have mixed learning styles and teaching styles preferences respectively. In addition, the teachers’ teaching styles generally have a positive impact on the students but there were occasions when these were not so. These findings will be discussed in greater detail in this paper.
format Article
author Lee, Mei Ph’ng
Thang, Siew Ming
Radha M. K. Nambiar,
spellingShingle Lee, Mei Ph’ng
Thang, Siew Ming
Radha M. K. Nambiar,
Matching teaching styles and learning styles: what happens in the case of a mismatch?
author_facet Lee, Mei Ph’ng
Thang, Siew Ming
Radha M. K. Nambiar,
author_sort Lee, Mei Ph’ng
title Matching teaching styles and learning styles: what happens in the case of a mismatch?
title_short Matching teaching styles and learning styles: what happens in the case of a mismatch?
title_full Matching teaching styles and learning styles: what happens in the case of a mismatch?
title_fullStr Matching teaching styles and learning styles: what happens in the case of a mismatch?
title_full_unstemmed Matching teaching styles and learning styles: what happens in the case of a mismatch?
title_sort matching teaching styles and learning styles: what happens in the case of a mismatch?
publisher Journal of Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2015
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9350/1/066-076_Teaching_Style_Learning-Mei.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9350/
http://www.ukm.my/e-bangi/index.php?option=com_jresearch&view=publicationslist&Itemid=45&lang=en
_version_ 1643737763882729472
score 13.160551