Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines

Formulaic sequences play a crucial role in building academic discourse. From among the variety of formulaic expressions, lexical bundles have been shown to serve particular facilitative functions in academic discourse. Defined as strings of word forms that commonly co-occur in natural discourse, lex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hadi Kashiha,, Chan, Swee Heng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UKM 2014
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7192/1/4555-16446-2-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7192/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/index
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.7192
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.71922016-12-14T06:43:21Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7192/ Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines Hadi Kashiha, Chan, Swee Heng Formulaic sequences play a crucial role in building academic discourse. From among the variety of formulaic expressions, lexical bundles have been shown to serve particular facilitative functions in academic discourse. Defined as strings of word forms that commonly co-occur in natural discourse, lexical bundles are characterized statistically by their frequency of occurrence and they contribute significantly to fluency in speech and writing. While previous research had focused on the use of these expressions in academic research articles across disciplines or on the difference between spoken and written registers, little research has been carried out to find out the language use of academic lectures from different disciplines in terms of the use of these bundles, orally. Taking into account this consideration, the present study aimed to investigate how lexical bundles are used by academic lecturers from different disciplinary communities. With the aim of comparing their language selection, the most frequent four-word lexical bundles in academic lectures of two disciplines, namely politics and chemistry were identified and categorized. The procedure adopts Biber et al.‟s (2004) functional categorization of lexical bundles to investigate the communicative purposes that lexical bundles convey in the lectures of the two groups and to see whether there were any disciplinary differences with regard to the bundles used. Based on the findings, there were some marked variations found across the two disciplines in terms of discourse functions of the lexical bundles. It seemed that academic lectures rely heavily on the use of specific word combinations to fulfill those functions related to their discipline. Penerbit UKM 2014-06 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7192/1/4555-16446-2-PB.pdf Hadi Kashiha, and Chan, Swee Heng (2014) Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies, 14 (2). pp. 15-27. ISSN 1675-8021 http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/index
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Perpustakaan Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description Formulaic sequences play a crucial role in building academic discourse. From among the variety of formulaic expressions, lexical bundles have been shown to serve particular facilitative functions in academic discourse. Defined as strings of word forms that commonly co-occur in natural discourse, lexical bundles are characterized statistically by their frequency of occurrence and they contribute significantly to fluency in speech and writing. While previous research had focused on the use of these expressions in academic research articles across disciplines or on the difference between spoken and written registers, little research has been carried out to find out the language use of academic lectures from different disciplines in terms of the use of these bundles, orally. Taking into account this consideration, the present study aimed to investigate how lexical bundles are used by academic lecturers from different disciplinary communities. With the aim of comparing their language selection, the most frequent four-word lexical bundles in academic lectures of two disciplines, namely politics and chemistry were identified and categorized. The procedure adopts Biber et al.‟s (2004) functional categorization of lexical bundles to investigate the communicative purposes that lexical bundles convey in the lectures of the two groups and to see whether there were any disciplinary differences with regard to the bundles used. Based on the findings, there were some marked variations found across the two disciplines in terms of discourse functions of the lexical bundles. It seemed that academic lectures rely heavily on the use of specific word combinations to fulfill those functions related to their discipline.
format Article
author Hadi Kashiha,
Chan, Swee Heng
spellingShingle Hadi Kashiha,
Chan, Swee Heng
Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
author_facet Hadi Kashiha,
Chan, Swee Heng
author_sort Hadi Kashiha,
title Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
title_short Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
title_full Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
title_fullStr Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
title_full_unstemmed Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
title_sort discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
publisher Penerbit UKM
publishDate 2014
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7192/1/4555-16446-2-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7192/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/index
_version_ 1643737041389748224
score 13.211869