Newspapers and politics in 2006 elections in Sarawak.

Newspapers have tremendous impact on how people perceive their world and on how they make decisions. The political decisions the people make could be shaped a lot by what they read in the newspaper. Newspapers often have their own private agenda on what news they are going to communicate to the gen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stanley Bye Kadam-Kiai,
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2009
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/612/1/akademika78%5B03%5DA4.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/612/
http://www.ukm.my/~penerbit/akademika
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-ukm.journal.612
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.6122011-08-11T07:42:23Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/612/ Newspapers and politics in 2006 elections in Sarawak. Stanley Bye Kadam-Kiai, Newspapers have tremendous impact on how people perceive their world and on how they make decisions. The political decisions the people make could be shaped a lot by what they read in the newspaper. Newspapers often have their own private agenda on what news they are going to communicate to the general public to attract their attention. In Malaysia, however, the newspapers must also know what the government wants them to publish; otherwise they risk their annual permits being revoked, terminated or suspended. As a consequence, mainstream newspapers in Malaysia in general give more coverage to the National Front or the Barisan Nasional (BN) which has governed the country since independence in 1957 and to its component parties especially the United Malay National Organisations (UMNO) and the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) at the national level, and the Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB) and the Sarawak United Peoples Party (SUPP) in the State of Sarawak than they do to the oppositions. The coverage is not only pro-BN, but it is so lopsided that the oppositions and many analysts alike often accused newspapers in the country guilty of extreme bias as they mainly cover news on the government and government related activities. Is this accusation accurate? Are newspapers in the country pro-government? One way to find out if this is so is to see how the two mainstream English newspapers in Sarawak, namely The Borneo Post and the Eastern Times, covered the Ninth Sarawak State Election which was held on 10-20 May 2006. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2009-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/612/1/akademika78%5B03%5DA4.pdf Stanley Bye Kadam-Kiai, (2009) Newspapers and politics in 2006 elections in Sarawak. AKADEMIKA, 77 . pp. 167-183. ISSN 0126-5008 http://www.ukm.my/~penerbit/akademika
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Perpustakaan Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description Newspapers have tremendous impact on how people perceive their world and on how they make decisions. The political decisions the people make could be shaped a lot by what they read in the newspaper. Newspapers often have their own private agenda on what news they are going to communicate to the general public to attract their attention. In Malaysia, however, the newspapers must also know what the government wants them to publish; otherwise they risk their annual permits being revoked, terminated or suspended. As a consequence, mainstream newspapers in Malaysia in general give more coverage to the National Front or the Barisan Nasional (BN) which has governed the country since independence in 1957 and to its component parties especially the United Malay National Organisations (UMNO) and the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) at the national level, and the Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB) and the Sarawak United Peoples Party (SUPP) in the State of Sarawak than they do to the oppositions. The coverage is not only pro-BN, but it is so lopsided that the oppositions and many analysts alike often accused newspapers in the country guilty of extreme bias as they mainly cover news on the government and government related activities. Is this accusation accurate? Are newspapers in the country pro-government? One way to find out if this is so is to see how the two mainstream English newspapers in Sarawak, namely The Borneo Post and the Eastern Times, covered the Ninth Sarawak State Election which was held on 10-20 May 2006.
format Article
author Stanley Bye Kadam-Kiai,
spellingShingle Stanley Bye Kadam-Kiai,
Newspapers and politics in 2006 elections in Sarawak.
author_facet Stanley Bye Kadam-Kiai,
author_sort Stanley Bye Kadam-Kiai,
title Newspapers and politics in 2006 elections in Sarawak.
title_short Newspapers and politics in 2006 elections in Sarawak.
title_full Newspapers and politics in 2006 elections in Sarawak.
title_fullStr Newspapers and politics in 2006 elections in Sarawak.
title_full_unstemmed Newspapers and politics in 2006 elections in Sarawak.
title_sort newspapers and politics in 2006 elections in sarawak.
publisher Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2009
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/612/1/akademika78%5B03%5DA4.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/612/
http://www.ukm.my/~penerbit/akademika
_version_ 1643734774983950336
score 13.160551